Yakama vs Immigrants from Italy Community Comparison

COMPARE

Yakama
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Italy
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaire
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Yakama

Immigrants from Italy

Poor
Good
1,331
SOCIAL INDEX
10.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
315th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,138
SOCIAL INDEX
78.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
85th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Italy Integration in Yakama Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,068,599 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Italy within Yakama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.906. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yakama within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.269% in Immigrants from Italy. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yakama corresponds to an increase of 268.7 Immigrants from Italy.
Yakama Integration in Immigrants from Italy Communities

Yakama vs Immigrants from Italy Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,009 compared to $48,654, a difference of 47.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($76,226 compared to $105,201, a difference of 38.0%), and median family income ($83,932 compared to $112,848, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,321 compared to $54,449, a difference of 0.24%), wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 11.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,234 compared to $64,065, a difference of 13.9%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Italy Income
Income MetricYakamaImmigrants from Italy
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$33,009
Exceptional
$48,654
Median Family Income
Tragic
$83,932
Exceptional
$112,848
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,225
Exceptional
$93,465
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,107
Exceptional
$50,581
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$45,002
Exceptional
$59,691
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,354
Exceptional
$42,446
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,321
Exceptional
$54,449
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$76,226
Exceptional
$105,201
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,992
Exceptional
$110,434
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,234
Exceptional
$64,065
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.7%
Poor
26.5%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Italy Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (21.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 106.2%), married-couple family poverty (9.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 94.7%), and family poverty (13.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 64.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 10.5%), single male poverty (15.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 30.7%), and single mother poverty (36.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 32.3%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Italy Poverty
Poverty MetricYakamaImmigrants from Italy
Poverty
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Families
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
8.0%
Males
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
12.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
18.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
12.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.1%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
22.1%
Exceptional
14.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.7%
Exceptional
14.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
22.6%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Males
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
12.2%
Single Females
Tragic
28.3%
Exceptional
19.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Fair
16.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.4%
Exceptional
27.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
18.3%
Excellent
11.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.4%
Exceptional
10.4%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Italy Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (18.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 109.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (8.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 83.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 83.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 9.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 10.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.8%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Italy Unemployment
Unemployment MetricYakamaImmigrants from Italy
Unemployment
Tragic
7.3%
Good
5.1%
Males
Tragic
7.9%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
6.7%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
15.6%
Fair
11.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.5%
Average
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
13.1%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.8%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.6%
Excellent
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.7%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
8.9%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.0%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.6%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.7%
Average
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
18.4%
Average
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Average
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.1%
Excellent
5.3%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Italy Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (79.1% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (79.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.58%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 3.3%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Italy Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricYakamaImmigrants from Italy
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.1%
Fair
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.8%
Exceptional
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
36.9%
Fair
36.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Average
75.1%
Poor
74.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.6%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.1%
Exceptional
85.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Exceptional
83.2%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Italy Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 103.1%), single mother households (8.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 45.7%), and births to unmarried women (40.3% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 5.8%), family households (69.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 7.0%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 7.1%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Italy Family Structure
Family Structure MetricYakamaImmigrants from Italy
Family Households
Exceptional
69.3%
Exceptional
64.8%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
30.8%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.2%
Exceptional
47.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.45
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.0%
Exceptional
47.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
11.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
40.3%
Exceptional
29.9%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Italy Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 115.9%), no vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 66.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (31.0% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 65.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.6% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 5.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (64.9% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 19.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (31.0% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 65.7%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Italy Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricYakamaImmigrants from Italy
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.6%
Poor
11.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.6%
Poor
89.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
64.9%
Poor
54.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
31.0%
Poor
18.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
12.9%
Poor
6.0%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Italy Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 81.3%), no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 74.6%), and bachelor's degree (24.5% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 68.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.5%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Italy Education Level
Education Level MetricYakamaImmigrants from Italy
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.6%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.6%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.6%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Good
97.9%
3rd Grade
Tragic
95.9%
Good
97.8%
4th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Good
97.6%
5th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Good
97.4%
6th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Average
97.1%
7th Grade
Tragic
91.7%
Good
96.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Good
95.8%
9th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Tragic
86.9%
Good
94.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
85.0%
Excellent
92.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
82.5%
Excellent
91.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
80.0%
Excellent
89.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
74.5%
Exceptional
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.6%
Excellent
66.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
46.2%
Exceptional
61.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
32.3%
Exceptional
49.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.5%
Exceptional
41.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.5%
Exceptional
17.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
2.1%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Italy Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Italy communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 41.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (29.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 37.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.6%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 9.8%), and disability age over 75 (51.3% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 11.9%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Italy Disability
Disability MetricYakamaImmigrants from Italy
Disability
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.00%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
29.6%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.3%
Exceptional
45.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.9%
Average
3.0%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.8%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Good
2.4%