Yakama vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Yakama
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Yakama
Chickasaw
1,331
SOCIAL INDEX
10.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
315th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Yakama Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 13,190,592 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Yakama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.851. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yakama within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.051% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yakama corresponds to an increase of 50.7 Chickasaw.
![Yakama Integration in Chickasaw Communities](/correlation-charts/comparison/yakama-vs-chickasaw/yakama-vs-chickasaw-community-integration.webp)
Yakama vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Yakama and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,321 compared to $44,763, a difference of 21.3%), wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 14.4%), and per capita income ($33,009 compared to $36,475, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($83,932 compared to $85,356, a difference of 1.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($76,226 compared to $77,929, a difference of 2.2%), and median household income ($72,225 compared to $70,005, a difference of 3.2%).
![Yakama vs Chickasaw Income](/correlation-charts/comparison/yakama-vs-chickasaw/yakama-vs-chickasaw-income.webp)
Income Metric | Yakama | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $33,009 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $83,932 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $72,225 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $39,107 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $45,002 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,354 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,321 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $76,226 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $86,992 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,234 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.7% | Tragic 27.2% |
Yakama vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yakama and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (21.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 63.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 57.4%), and married-couple family poverty (9.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 54.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (15.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 2.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.3% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 3.6%).
![Yakama vs Chickasaw Poverty](/correlation-charts/comparison/yakama-vs-chickasaw/yakama-vs-chickasaw-poverty.webp)
Poverty Metric | Yakama | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 15.3% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.3% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.1% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 22.1% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.7% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 22.6% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 28.3% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 36.4% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.8% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 18.3% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 21.4% | Tragic 13.1% |
Yakama vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yakama and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (18.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 150.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (8.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 86.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 57.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 14.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 15.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 30.0%).
![Yakama vs Chickasaw Unemployment](/correlation-charts/comparison/yakama-vs-chickasaw/yakama-vs-chickasaw-unemployment.webp)
Unemployment Metric | Yakama | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 7.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 7.9% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 6.7% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 22.5% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.8% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 8.9% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.6% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.9% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 8.1% | Good 5.4% |
Yakama vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yakama and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.0% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.8% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.81%).
![Yakama vs Chickasaw Labor Participation](/correlation-charts/comparison/yakama-vs-chickasaw/yakama-vs-chickasaw-labor-force.webp)
Labor Participation Metric | Yakama | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.1% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 75.8% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Good 36.9% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Average 75.1% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 80.6% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.1% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.6% | Tragic 79.0% |
Yakama vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yakama and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 52.1%), single mother households (8.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 19.4%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.5%), currently married (44.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and family households (69.3% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 7.6%).
![Yakama vs Chickasaw Family Structure](/correlation-charts/comparison/yakama-vs-chickasaw/yakama-vs-chickasaw-family-structure.webp)
Family Structure Metric | Yakama | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 69.3% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 30.8% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 45.2% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.45 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.4% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.0% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 40.3% | Tragic 36.3% |
Yakama vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 74.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (31.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 39.6%), and no vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (64.9% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 10.0%), and no vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 18.9%).
![Yakama vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability](/correlation-charts/comparison/yakama-vs-chickasaw/yakama-vs-chickasaw-vehicle-availability.webp)
Vehicle Availability Metric | Yakama | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.6% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 64.9% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 31.0% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 12.9% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Yakama vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yakama and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 109.7%), bachelor's degree (24.5% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 24.2%), and master's degree (9.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.9%).
![Yakama vs Chickasaw Education Level](/correlation-charts/comparison/yakama-vs-chickasaw/yakama-vs-chickasaw-education-level.webp)
Education Level Metric | Yakama | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.6% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 95.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 95.2% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 94.8% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 91.7% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 90.1% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 86.9% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 85.0% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 82.5% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 80.0% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 74.5% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 52.6% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 46.2% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 32.3% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.5% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
Yakama vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.00% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 74.2%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 29.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.050%), disability age over 75 (51.3% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and disability age 65 to 74 (29.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 1.9%).
![Yakama vs Chickasaw Disability](/correlation-charts/comparison/yakama-vs-chickasaw/yakama-vs-chickasaw-disability.webp)
Disability Metric | Yakama | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.00% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 29.6% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.3% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.9% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.9% |