Vietnamese vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Vietnamese
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Vietnamese
Chickasaw
2,448
SOCIAL INDEX
22.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
257th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Vietnamese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,487,318 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Vietnamese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.132. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Vietnamese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Vietnamese corresponds to a decrease of 2.4 Chickasaw.
Vietnamese vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 29.3%), householder income under 25 years ($56,127 compared to $44,763, a difference of 25.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,089 compared to $77,929, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($56,143 compared to $53,732, a difference of 4.5%), median male earnings ($52,525 compared to $47,832, a difference of 9.8%), and median family income ($96,123 compared to $85,356, a difference of 12.6%).
Income Metric | Vietnamese | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Poor $42,368 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $96,123 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Poor $82,248 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,172 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Poor $52,525 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Excellent $40,377 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $56,127 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Fair $92,089 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $93,788 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,143 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.0% | Tragic 27.2% |
Vietnamese vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 36.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 30.6%), and single male poverty (12.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (19.4% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.18%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.5% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 0.52%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.6% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
Poverty Metric | Vietnamese | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 11.5% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.4% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.4% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Good 12.7% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.0% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Average 16.3% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.9% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.0% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 13.1% |
Vietnamese vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 40.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 29.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Vietnamese | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 6.5% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 14.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 21.5% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.6% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.1% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.8% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Good 8.9% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.5% | Good 5.4% |
Vietnamese vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.6% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 29.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 2.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Vietnamese | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.6% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.0% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 29.6% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 70.6% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.8% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.6% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.8% | Tragic 79.0% |
Vietnamese vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 34.8%), divorced or separated (10.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 32.0%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.24%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and married-couple households (43.6% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 5.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Vietnamese | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Average 64.2% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Excellent 27.7% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.6% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.37 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Poor 6.7% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.0% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Tragic 36.3% |
Vietnamese vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (26.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 233.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 91.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 78.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (73.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 25.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.5% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 53.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 78.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Vietnamese | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 26.2% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 73.8% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 38.5% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 3.9% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Vietnamese vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 87.5%), master's degree (15.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 38.1%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.6%).
Education Level Metric | Vietnamese | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 95.9% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.5% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.3% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.9% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 89.4% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 87.9% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.4% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.7% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 57.0% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Fair 45.8% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Excellent 15.8% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Good 4.5% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Average 1.9% | Tragic 1.5% |
Vietnamese vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.81% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 114.3%), hearing disability (2.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 87.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 62.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 4.5%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 6.9%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 10.8%).
Disability Metric | Vietnamese | Chickasaw |
Disability | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.81% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.5% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 23.2% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Poor 47.9% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.7% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Average 6.1% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.9% |