Ute vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,820,002 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.189% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to an increase of 189.2 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $106,849, a difference of 27.3%), median family income ($87,596 compared to $110,011, a difference of 25.6%), and median household income ($72,402 compared to $90,618, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $51,259, a difference of 2.5%), wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 5.6%), and median male earnings ($48,899 compared to $56,302, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (16.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 59.4%), married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 57.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 55.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 15.9%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 18.8%), and single male poverty (15.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 19.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 47.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 45.7%), and male unemployment (6.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 7.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 9.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (60.9% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 10.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 9.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 34.0%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 17.2%), and births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.44%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.85%), and married-couple households (44.4% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 35.9%), no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 28.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 51.2%), bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 40.1%), and associate's degree (38.6% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.090%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 36.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 28.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.89%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.6%).