Ute vs Yup'ik Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Yup'ik
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ute

Yup'ik

Fair
Fair
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,388
SOCIAL INDEX
21.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
262nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Yup'ik Integration in Ute Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 20,918,240 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.997. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.159% in Yup'ik. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to an increase of 158.9 Yup'ik.
Ute Integration in Yup'ik Communities

Ute vs Yup'ik Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($48,899 compared to $39,504, a difference of 23.8%), per capita income ($36,651 compared to $30,518, a difference of 20.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,949 compared to $60,727, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $81,000, a difference of 3.6%), median household income ($72,402 compared to $69,695, a difference of 3.9%), and median female earnings ($34,960 compared to $32,730, a difference of 6.8%).
Ute vs Yup'ik Income
Income MetricUteYup'ik
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,651
Tragic
$30,518
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,596
Tragic
$79,290
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,402
Tragic
$69,695
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,051
Tragic
$35,942
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,899
Tragic
$39,504
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,960
Tragic
$32,730
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,997
Exceptional
$54,732
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,166
Tragic
$73,688
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,937
Tragic
$81,000
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,949
Average
$60,727
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.8%
Exceptional
24.7%

Ute vs Yup'ik Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 122.3%), married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 108.0%), and single male poverty (15.7% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 101.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 6.4%), single female poverty (28.4% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 6.8%), and single mother poverty (35.7% compared to 32.5%, a difference of 10.1%).
Ute vs Yup'ik Poverty
Poverty MetricUteYup'ik
Poverty
Tragic
16.9%
Tragic
20.8%
Families
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
18.7%
Males
Tragic
16.2%
Tragic
20.4%
Females
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
21.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.4%
Tragic
27.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
24.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Tragic
27.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Tragic
25.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
24.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
25.8%
Single Males
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Females
Tragic
28.4%
Tragic
26.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
32.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.7%
Tragic
32.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
13.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
14.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
15.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
32.7%

Ute vs Yup'ik Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 225.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 170.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 169.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 44.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 44.9%), and female unemployment (6.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 77.4%).
Ute vs Yup'ik Unemployment
Unemployment MetricUteYup'ik
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
13.6%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
16.4%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
10.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
23.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
41.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
20.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Tragic
17.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
18.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
13.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
9.5%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
9.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
12.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
21.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
18.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
11.0%

Ute vs Yup'ik Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 11.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 10.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 70.9%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 0.63%), in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.4% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.8%).
Ute vs Yup'ik Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricUteYup'ik
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
60.9%
Tragic
62.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.7%
Tragic
73.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
37.1%
Tragic
33.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.8%
Tragic
70.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.8%
Tragic
73.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
78.9%
Tragic
76.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.4%
Tragic
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
76.6%
Tragic
78.6%

Ute vs Yup'ik Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 81.7%), births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 71.0%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.4% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 0.84%), currently married (43.9% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 10.0%), and family households (64.3% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 12.6%).
Ute vs Yup'ik Family Structure
Family Structure MetricUteYup'ik
Family Households
Average
64.3%
Exceptional
72.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Exceptional
37.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.4%
Tragic
44.1%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.49
Exceptional
4.00
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
5.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
10.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.9%
Tragic
39.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
10.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.0%
Tragic
56.4%

Ute vs Yup'ik Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 295.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 61.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 51.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 52.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 54.8%).
Ute vs Yup'ik Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricUteYup'ik
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
45.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Tragic
58.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Tragic
34.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Tragic
14.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Tragic
5.7%

Ute vs Yup'ik Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 83.7%), bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 59.2%), and associate's degree (38.6% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 54.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (86.2% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 0.12%), 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and 11th grade (91.1% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.13%).
Ute vs Yup'ik Education Level
Education Level MetricUteYup'ik
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
99.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
99.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
99.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
99.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
99.0%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
5th Grade
Good
97.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Average
96.1%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Average
95.8%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Excellent
95.2%
10th Grade
Fair
93.4%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Tragic
91.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Tragic
87.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.2%
Tragic
86.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.8%
Tragic
80.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.2%
Tragic
45.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.8%
Tragic
39.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Tragic
25.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.9%
Tragic
19.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
8.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Tragic
2.9%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
1.3%

Ute vs Yup'ik Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 425.6%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 66.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.5%), disability (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 4.5%).
Ute vs Yup'ik Disability
Disability MetricUteYup'ik
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.86%
Tragic
4.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.3%
Tragic
37.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.6%
Tragic
61.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.7%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Exceptional
1.9%