Ute vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ute

Tohono O'odham

Fair
Tragic
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tohono O'odham Integration in Ute Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 30,307,060 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.232. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to a decrease of 4.6 Tohono O'odham.
Ute Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

Ute vs Tohono O'odham Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 25.4%), median male earnings ($48,899 compared to $39,543, a difference of 23.7%), and median family income ($87,596 compared to $72,193, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,960 compared to $33,205, a difference of 5.3%), householder income over 65 years ($52,949 compared to $49,121, a difference of 7.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $45,248, a difference of 10.5%).
Ute vs Tohono O'odham Income
Income MetricUteTohono O'odham
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,651
Tragic
$30,256
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,596
Tragic
$72,193
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,402
Tragic
$61,663
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,051
Tragic
$36,349
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,899
Tragic
$39,543
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,960
Tragic
$33,205
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,997
Tragic
$45,248
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,166
Tragic
$69,068
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,937
Tragic
$73,774
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,949
Tragic
$49,121
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.8%
Exceptional
22.1%

Ute vs Tohono O'odham Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 74.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 71.3%), and family poverty (12.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 69.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 18.9%), single female poverty (28.4% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 20.4%), and single mother poverty (35.7% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 20.5%).
Ute vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
Poverty MetricUteTohono O'odham
Poverty
Tragic
16.9%
Tragic
24.4%
Families
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
20.4%
Males
Tragic
16.2%
Tragic
22.9%
Females
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.4%
Tragic
31.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
24.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Tragic
31.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
31.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Males
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Tragic
28.4%
Tragic
34.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.7%
Tragic
43.0%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
11.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
20.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
19.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
21.5%

Ute vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 80.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 76.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 58.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.2%).
Ute vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
Unemployment MetricUteTohono O'odham
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
8.9%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
10.2%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
7.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
22.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
9.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
8.9%

Ute vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 18.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (78.9% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 4.3%).
Ute vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricUteTohono O'odham
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
60.9%
Tragic
57.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.7%
Tragic
70.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
37.1%
Tragic
31.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.8%
Tragic
68.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.8%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
78.9%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.4%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
76.6%
Tragic
75.1%

Ute vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 51.0%), single father households (3.0% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 29.1%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.51%), average family size (3.49 compared to 3.53, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (64.3% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 4.3%).
Ute vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
Family Structure MetricUteTohono O'odham
Family Households
Average
64.3%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.4%
Tragic
37.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.49
Exceptional
3.53
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
3.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
9.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.9%
Tragic
36.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.0%
Tragic
49.8%

Ute vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 34.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 32.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 13.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 20.2%).
Ute vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricUteTohono O'odham
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Tragic
84.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Tragic
50.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Excellent
6.6%

Ute vs Tohono O'odham Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 41.2%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 38.2%), and bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.34%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.34%).
Ute vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
Education Level MetricUteTohono O'odham
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Good
97.4%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Average
96.1%
Tragic
95.0%
8th Grade
Average
95.8%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Fair
93.4%
Tragic
90.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Tragic
87.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Tragic
84.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.2%
Tragic
82.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.8%
Tragic
77.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.2%
Tragic
52.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.8%
Tragic
47.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Tragic
31.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.9%
Tragic
24.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
9.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
1.5%

Ute vs Tohono O'odham Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 154.1%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 46.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 4.6%), disability age over 75 (52.6% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 7.9%), and cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 11.5%).
Ute vs Tohono O'odham Disability
Disability MetricUteTohono O'odham
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.86%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.3%
Tragic
36.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.6%
Tragic
56.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.8%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
8.7%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Tragic
3.1%