Ute vs Thai Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,078,389 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Thais within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.611. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.100% in Thais. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to a decrease of 100.2 Thais.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Thai communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $129,560, a difference of 54.3%), median household income ($72,402 compared to $110,648, a difference of 52.8%), and median family income ($87,596 compared to $131,281, a difference of 49.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 9.7%), householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $59,187, a difference of 18.4%), and median female earnings ($34,960 compared to $47,577, a difference of 36.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Thai communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 91.4%), male poverty (16.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 86.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 86.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 18.3%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 27.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 31.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Thai communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 53.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 49.2%), and male unemployment (6.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Thai communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (60.9% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 10.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 10.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Thai communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 54.0%), births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 37.4%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 4.4%), average family size (3.49 compared to 3.22, a difference of 8.3%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Thai communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 41.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 40.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 2.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Thai communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 85.3%), bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 62.2%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 52.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.020%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Thai communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 56.0%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 37.9%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 7.2%), disability age over 75 (52.6% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 15.8%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 18.1%).