Ute vs Taiwanese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Taiwanese
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ute

Taiwanese

Fair
Good
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,532
SOCIAL INDEX
62.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
151st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Taiwanese Integration in Ute Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 16,173,538 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.904% in Taiwanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to an increase of 1,904.1 Taiwanese.
Ute Integration in Taiwanese Communities

Ute vs Taiwanese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,651 compared to $46,455, a difference of 26.8%), median household income ($72,402 compared to $89,900, a difference of 24.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $104,180, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $49,804, a difference of 0.39%), wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 10.5%), and median male earnings ($48,899 compared to $55,556, a difference of 13.6%).
Ute vs Taiwanese Income
Income MetricUteTaiwanese
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,651
Exceptional
$46,455
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,596
Exceptional
$107,295
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,402
Exceptional
$89,900
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,051
Excellent
$47,902
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,899
Good
$55,556
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,960
Excellent
$40,576
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,997
Tragic
$49,804
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,166
Exceptional
$101,492
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,937
Excellent
$104,180
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,949
Excellent
$62,894
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.8%
Excellent
25.1%

Ute vs Taiwanese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 62.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 51.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 49.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 19.6%).
Ute vs Taiwanese Poverty
Poverty MetricUteTaiwanese
Poverty
Tragic
16.9%
Good
12.2%
Families
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Tragic
16.2%
Good
11.0%
Females
Tragic
17.5%
Good
13.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.4%
Tragic
21.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
11.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Exceptional
14.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
14.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
14.6%
Single Males
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
10.9%
Single Females
Tragic
28.4%
Exceptional
19.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.7%
Exceptional
27.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.2%
Fair
11.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Poor
12.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Excellent
11.0%

Ute vs Taiwanese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 38.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 32.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 6.0%).
Ute vs Taiwanese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricUteTaiwanese
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Average
5.3%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Fair
5.3%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
15.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Good
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.2%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Exceptional
6.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.8%

Ute vs Taiwanese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 9.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (78.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 7.1%).
Ute vs Taiwanese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricUteTaiwanese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
60.9%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.7%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
37.1%
Tragic
33.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.8%
Fair
74.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.8%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
78.9%
Fair
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.4%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
76.6%
Exceptional
83.4%

Ute vs Taiwanese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 34.8%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.4%), and births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 1.6%), married-couple households (44.4% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and currently married (43.9% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 4.3%).
Ute vs Taiwanese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricUteTaiwanese
Family Households
Average
64.3%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Tragic
26.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.4%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.49
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.9%
Poor
45.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
11.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.0%
Exceptional
29.0%

Ute vs Taiwanese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 24.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 13.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.31%), no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.51%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 5.0%).
Ute vs Taiwanese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricUteTaiwanese
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
11.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Tragic
88.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Tragic
53.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Excellent
20.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Exceptional
7.0%

Ute vs Taiwanese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 37.2%), bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 29.3%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (91.1% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.30%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.67%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.68%).
Ute vs Taiwanese Education Level
Education Level MetricUteTaiwanese
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.3%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Good
97.4%
Tragic
96.7%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Average
96.1%
Tragic
94.8%
8th Grade
Average
95.8%
Tragic
94.7%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Tragic
93.6%
10th Grade
Fair
93.4%
Tragic
92.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Tragic
91.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Tragic
90.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.2%
Tragic
87.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.8%
Tragic
84.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.2%
Good
66.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.8%
Excellent
60.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Excellent
47.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.9%
Exceptional
40.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
16.1%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.1%

Ute vs Taiwanese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 52.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 35.9%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.7%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.7%).
Ute vs Taiwanese Disability
Disability MetricUteTaiwanese
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Exceptional
10.8%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
11.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.86%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.3%
Excellent
22.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.6%
Tragic
48.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Exceptional
2.4%