Ute vs Sioux Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,836,978 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Sioux within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.151. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.199% in Sioux. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to a decrease of 198.9 Sioux.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 14.2%), per capita income ($36,651 compared to $33,921, a difference of 8.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $46,417, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,960 compared to $35,063, a difference of 0.29%), householder income over 65 years ($52,949 compared to $52,509, a difference of 0.84%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $81,750, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (15.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 41.6%), married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 35.1%), and family poverty (12.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (35.7% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 8.6%), single female poverty (28.4% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 10.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 88.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 76.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 70.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 0.79%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 12.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (78.9% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (79.4% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 24.2%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 19.4%), and single father households (3.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.31%), family households (64.3% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.33%), and average family size (3.49 compared to 3.52, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 15.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 9.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 0.37%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 0.47%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 36.8%), no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 27.7%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (38.6% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 0.38%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 111.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 18.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.010%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.7%).