Ute vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,859,417 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.032. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.059% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to a decrease of 59.2 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($52,949 compared to $71,021, a difference of 34.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $105,149, a difference of 25.3%), and median household income ($72,402 compared to $89,919, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($48,899 compared to $52,306, a difference of 7.0%), wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 9.2%), and median earnings ($41,051 compared to $45,027, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (16.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 52.3%), poverty (16.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 46.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 45.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 14.6%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 17.6%), and single male poverty (15.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 24.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 40.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 26.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 0.74%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 18.7%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.1%), and married-couple households (44.4% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.49 compared to 3.43, a difference of 1.8%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 50.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 10.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 4.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 7.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 42.8%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 27.5%), and associate's degree (38.6% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.29%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.29%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 56.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.33%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.8%).