Ute vs Menominee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 22,170,278 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Menominee within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.042% in Menominee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to an increase of 42.4 Menominee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 22.3%), median male earnings ($48,899 compared to $42,581, a difference of 14.8%), and median family income ($87,596 compared to $79,563, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($52,949 compared to $51,719, a difference of 2.4%), median female earnings ($34,960 compared to $33,894, a difference of 3.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,166 compared to $79,358, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 30.0%), married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.55%), child poverty among boys under 16 (21.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.60%), and female poverty (17.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 103.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 64.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 9.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 68.7%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (79.4% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.9% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 54.9%), single father households (3.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 42.3%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.8%), family households (64.3% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and currently married (43.9% compared to 42.3%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 76.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 32.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 0.45%), no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 48.7%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 29.6%), and no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.040%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 166.8%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 30.8%), and male disability (11.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.49%), disability age over 75 (52.6% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 0.51%), and female disability (12.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.9%).