Ute vs Iroquois Community Comparison
COMPARE
Ute
Iroquois
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Ute
Iroquois
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iroquois Integration in Ute Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,259,989 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.221. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.766% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to an increase of 1,765.5 Iroquois.
Ute vs Iroquois Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 10.8%), per capita income ($36,651 compared to $39,104, a difference of 6.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $47,380, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($48,899 compared to $49,374, a difference of 0.97%), householder income over 65 years ($52,949 compared to $53,737, a difference of 1.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,166 compared to $83,682, a difference of 1.8%).
Income Metric | Ute | Iroquois |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,651 | Tragic $39,104 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $87,596 | Tragic $90,543 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $72,402 | Tragic $74,279 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,051 | Tragic $42,430 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,899 | Tragic $49,374 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,960 | Tragic $36,408 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $49,997 | Tragic $47,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,166 | Tragic $83,682 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,937 | Tragic $87,255 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $52,949 | Tragic $53,737 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.8% | Excellent 25.1% |
Ute vs Iroquois Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (16.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 22.9%), married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.9%), and poverty (16.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and single mother poverty (35.7% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 2.5%).
Poverty Metric | Ute | Iroquois |
Poverty | Tragic 16.9% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Tragic 16.2% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Tragic 17.5% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.4% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.9% | Tragic 17.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.5% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.6% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 20.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 28.4% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 35.7% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.4% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 13.5% |
Ute vs Iroquois Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 37.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 34.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Ute | Iroquois |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.3% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.6% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.2% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Poor 6.8% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.2% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 6.8% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.5% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.0% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 5.7% |
Ute vs Iroquois Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (78.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Ute | Iroquois |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 60.9% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 73.7% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Good 37.1% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.8% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 80.8% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 78.9% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 79.4% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 76.6% | Tragic 80.6% |
Ute vs Iroquois Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 15.8%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 13.8%), and average family size (3.49 compared to 3.16, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.4% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 1.6%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and currently married (43.9% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 1.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Ute | Iroquois |
Family Households | Average 64.3% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 26.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.4% | Tragic 43.7% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.49 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.0% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.9% | Tragic 44.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.0% | Tragic 38.2% |
Ute vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 35.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 16.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.56%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 5.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Ute | Iroquois |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.6% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.7% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.6% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.7% | Average 19.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Good 6.5% |
Ute vs Iroquois Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 26.2%), no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 20.1%), and associate's degree (38.6% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.010%), 2nd grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.030%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.040%).
Education Level Metric | Ute | Iroquois |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Excellent 97.7% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Good 97.4% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Good 97.1% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Average 96.1% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Average 95.8% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Good 95.0% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.4% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.1% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.0% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 86.2% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.8% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.2% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.8% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 42.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.9% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 4.0% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 1.6% |
Ute vs Iroquois Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 69.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 25.2%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 5.2%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 5.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 7.2%).
Disability Metric | Ute | Iroquois |
Disability | Poor 11.9% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Tragic 11.6% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Poor 12.4% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.86% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Excellent 5.5% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.3% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 52.6% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Average 2.5% | Tragic 2.7% |