Ute vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,744,945 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.196. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.437% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to an increase of 436.8 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,651 compared to $53,874, a difference of 47.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $122,343, a difference of 45.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,166 compared to $119,496, a difference of 45.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 5.0%), householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $58,239, a difference of 16.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,949 compared to $70,238, a difference of 32.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 75.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 63.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 63.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 9.7%), and single father poverty (18.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 25.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 38.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 37.3%), and male unemployment (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 16.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 8.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 55.4%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 39.1%), and births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.2%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.49 compared to 3.24, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 36.1%), no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 21.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 6.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 74.5%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 62.3%), and bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 53.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.040%), 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.51%), and 5th grade (97.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 51.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 33.0%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.6%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.3%).