Ute vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ute

Immigrants from Zimbabwe

Fair
Exceptional
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Ute Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,672,782 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to a decrease of 0.0 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.
Ute Integration in Immigrants from Zimbabwe Communities

Ute vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,651 compared to $47,394, a difference of 29.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $104,992, a difference of 25.1%), and median family income ($87,596 compared to $108,830, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $51,914, a difference of 3.8%), wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 9.6%), and median male earnings ($48,899 compared to $57,352, a difference of 17.3%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income
Income MetricUteImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,651
Exceptional
$47,394
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,596
Exceptional
$108,830
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,402
Exceptional
$89,496
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,051
Exceptional
$48,913
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,899
Exceptional
$57,352
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,960
Exceptional
$41,527
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,997
Fair
$51,914
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,166
Excellent
$97,880
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,937
Exceptional
$104,992
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,949
Exceptional
$63,643
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.8%
Good
25.3%

Ute vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (16.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 54.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 48.8%), and married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 10.1%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 14.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 18.2%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty
Poverty MetricUteImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Poverty
Tragic
16.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Tragic
16.2%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.4%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
12.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Exceptional
15.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
15.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
15.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Males
Tragic
15.7%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Tragic
28.4%
Exceptional
20.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Good
16.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.7%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
9.9%

Ute vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 46.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 37.0%), and male unemployment (6.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 9.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 11.9%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment
Unemployment MetricUteImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.2%

Ute vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (60.9% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 9.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 9.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 5.5%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricUteImmigrants from Zimbabwe
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
60.9%
Exceptional
66.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.7%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
37.1%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.8%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.8%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
78.9%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.4%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
76.6%
Exceptional
83.4%

Ute vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 32.1%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 15.2%), and average family size (3.49 compared to 3.19, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (64.3% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and married-couple households (44.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 4.2%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure
Family Structure MetricUteImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Family Households
Average
64.3%
Tragic
63.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.4%
Average
46.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.49
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.1%
Good
6.2%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.9%
Average
46.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.0%
Excellent
30.3%

Ute vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 44.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 18.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 17.7%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricUteImmigrants from Zimbabwe
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.6%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Good
55.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Poor
6.0%

Ute vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 48.8%), bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 37.8%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.0%), 2nd grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.020%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.040%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level
Education Level MetricUteImmigrants from Zimbabwe
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Good
97.4%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Average
96.1%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Average
95.8%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Fair
93.4%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Exceptional
93.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Exceptional
92.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.2%
Exceptional
90.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.8%
Exceptional
87.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.2%
Exceptional
68.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.8%
Exceptional
63.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
50.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.9%
Exceptional
42.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
17.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.2%

Ute vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 39.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 25.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.39%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 4.4%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability
Disability MetricUteImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.86%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.3%
Exceptional
22.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.6%
Good
47.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Good
3.0%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Poor
17.5%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Exceptional
2.3%