Ute vs Immigrants from Malaysia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Malaysia
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ute

Immigrants from Malaysia

Fair
Good
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,792
SOCIAL INDEX
75.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
105th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Malaysia Integration in Ute Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,677,257 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.034% in Immigrants from Malaysia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to an increase of 34.1 Immigrants from Malaysia.
Ute Integration in Immigrants from Malaysia Communities

Ute vs Immigrants from Malaysia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,651 compared to $49,983, a difference of 36.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $112,796, a difference of 34.4%), and median household income ($72,402 compared to $96,292, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 5.6%), householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $54,179, a difference of 8.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,949 compared to $65,497, a difference of 23.7%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Malaysia Income
Income MetricUteImmigrants from Malaysia
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,651
Exceptional
$49,983
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,596
Exceptional
$115,880
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,402
Exceptional
$96,292
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,051
Exceptional
$52,514
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,899
Exceptional
$62,121
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,960
Exceptional
$43,835
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,997
Exceptional
$54,179
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,166
Exceptional
$107,650
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,937
Exceptional
$112,796
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,949
Exceptional
$65,497
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.8%
Fair
26.3%

Ute vs Immigrants from Malaysia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 50.9%), male poverty (16.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 47.4%), and single female poverty (28.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 4.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 11.1%), and single father poverty (18.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 21.7%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Malaysia Poverty
Poverty MetricUteImmigrants from Malaysia
Poverty
Tragic
16.9%
Good
12.0%
Families
Tragic
12.1%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Tragic
16.2%
Good
11.0%
Females
Tragic
17.5%
Excellent
13.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.4%
Poor
20.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
12.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
15.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
15.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Males
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
12.0%
Single Females
Tragic
28.4%
Exceptional
19.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
15.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.7%
Exceptional
27.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.4%
Good
5.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.2%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Fair
12.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
10.4%

Ute vs Immigrants from Malaysia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 42.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 38.7%), and male unemployment (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.0%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Malaysia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricUteImmigrants from Malaysia
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.6%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Average
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
7.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Exceptional
6.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.0%

Ute vs Immigrants from Malaysia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.9% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 6.5%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Malaysia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricUteImmigrants from Malaysia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
60.9%
Exceptional
66.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.7%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
37.1%
Tragic
34.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.8%
Tragic
73.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.8%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
78.9%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.4%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
76.6%
Exceptional
83.2%

Ute vs Immigrants from Malaysia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 44.9%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 25.6%), and births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.58%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.81%), and married-couple households (44.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 6.2%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Malaysia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricUteImmigrants from Malaysia
Family Households
Average
64.3%
Poor
64.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.4%
Excellent
47.2%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.49
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.7%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.9%
Excellent
47.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
11.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.0%
Exceptional
27.4%

Ute vs Immigrants from Malaysia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 48.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 23.9%), and no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 7.4%), and no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 17.2%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Malaysia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricUteImmigrants from Malaysia
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
13.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Tragic
86.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Tragic
52.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Tragic
18.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Tragic
5.9%

Ute vs Immigrants from Malaysia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 61.4%), bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 45.6%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.10%), 5th grade (97.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.44%), and 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.45%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Malaysia Education Level
Education Level MetricUteImmigrants from Malaysia
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Good
97.4%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Average
96.1%
Tragic
95.6%
8th Grade
Average
95.8%
Tragic
95.3%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Poor
94.5%
10th Grade
Fair
93.4%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Fair
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Average
91.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.2%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.8%
Excellent
86.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.2%
Exceptional
69.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.8%
Exceptional
64.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
52.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.9%
Exceptional
45.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
18.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Exceptional
5.7%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.6%

Ute vs Immigrants from Malaysia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 37.3%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 27.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.99%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.9%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Malaysia Disability
Disability MetricUteImmigrants from Malaysia
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Exceptional
10.6%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.86%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.3%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.6%
Exceptional
46.4%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.5%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Exceptional
2.3%