Ute vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison
COMPARE
Ute
Immigrants from Laos
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Ute
Immigrants from Laos
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,709
SOCIAL INDEX
24.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
242nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Laos Integration in Ute Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,611,282 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.023% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to an increase of 23.3 Immigrants from Laos.
Ute vs Immigrants from Laos Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 16.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $90,909, a difference of 8.3%), and median household income ($72,402 compared to $78,327, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $50,041, a difference of 0.090%), median male earnings ($48,899 compared to $49,190, a difference of 0.60%), and per capita income ($36,651 compared to $37,857, a difference of 3.3%).
Income Metric | Ute | Immigrants from Laos |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,651 | Tragic $37,857 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $87,596 | Tragic $92,239 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $72,402 | Tragic $78,327 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,051 | Tragic $42,884 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,899 | Tragic $49,190 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,960 | Tragic $36,841 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $49,997 | Tragic $50,041 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,166 | Tragic $85,553 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,937 | Tragic $90,909 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $52,949 | Tragic $56,722 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.8% | Exceptional 23.8% |
Ute vs Immigrants from Laos Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (16.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 28.5%), single female poverty (28.4% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 23.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 6.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 8.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 9.8%).
Poverty Metric | Ute | Immigrants from Laos |
Poverty | Tragic 16.9% | Tragic 13.8% |
Families | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 10.2% |
Males | Tragic 16.2% | Tragic 12.6% |
Females | Tragic 17.5% | Tragic 15.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.4% | Tragic 20.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.9% | Tragic 15.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.5% | Tragic 19.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Tragic 18.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.6% | Tragic 18.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 18.9% |
Single Males | Tragic 15.7% | Fair 13.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 28.4% | Tragic 22.9% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 35.7% | Tragic 30.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.2% | Fair 11.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 12.9% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 13.8% |
Ute vs Immigrants from Laos Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 35.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 30.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Ute | Immigrants from Laos |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.3% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Poor 5.4% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.3% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.6% | Excellent 17.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.2% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Poor 6.8% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.0% | Average 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.3% | Fair 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.2% | Fair 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.5% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 6.8% | Fair 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.5% | Average 7.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.0% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.9% | Fair 5.5% |
Ute vs Immigrants from Laos Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.9% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 5.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Ute | Immigrants from Laos |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 60.9% | Exceptional 66.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 73.7% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Good 37.1% | Exceptional 40.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.8% | Exceptional 77.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 80.8% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 78.9% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 79.4% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 76.6% | Tragic 81.6% |
Ute vs Immigrants from Laos Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 7.9%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and average family size (3.49 compared to 3.34, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.5%), married-couple households (44.4% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Ute | Immigrants from Laos |
Family Households | Average 64.3% | Exceptional 65.3% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 29.8% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.4% | Tragic 45.1% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.49 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.0% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 7.7% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.9% | Tragic 45.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 12.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.0% | Tragic 34.0% |
Ute vs Immigrants from Laos Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 41.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 1.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 4.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Ute | Immigrants from Laos |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.6% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.7% | Exceptional 91.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.6% | Exceptional 59.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.7% | Exceptional 22.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Ute vs Immigrants from Laos Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 46.4%), no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 39.3%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (89.0% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.19%), high school diploma (86.2% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 0.47%), and 11th grade (91.1% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.64%).
Education Level Metric | Ute | Immigrants from Laos |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 3.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.6% |
4th Grade | Excellent 97.7% | Tragic 96.3% |
5th Grade | Good 97.4% | Tragic 96.0% |
6th Grade | Good 97.1% | Tragic 95.7% |
7th Grade | Average 96.1% | Tragic 94.5% |
8th Grade | Average 95.8% | Tragic 94.1% |
9th Grade | Good 95.0% | Tragic 93.2% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.4% | Tragic 91.9% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.1% | Tragic 90.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.0% | Tragic 88.9% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 86.2% | Tragic 86.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.8% | Tragic 82.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.2% | Tragic 61.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.8% | Tragic 54.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 40.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.9% | Tragic 31.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 4.0% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 1.4% |
Ute vs Immigrants from Laos Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 45.8%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 10.0%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and male disability (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.2%).
Disability Metric | Ute | Immigrants from Laos |
Disability | Poor 11.9% | Tragic 12.4% |
Males | Tragic 11.6% | Tragic 11.9% |
Females | Poor 12.4% | Tragic 12.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.86% | Fair 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Excellent 5.5% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 13.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.3% | Tragic 26.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 52.6% | Tragic 49.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Excellent 6.0% | Poor 6.3% |
Self-Care | Average 2.5% | Tragic 2.7% |