Ute vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Chile
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ute

Immigrants from Chile

Fair
Good
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Chile Integration in Ute Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,485,920 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.816. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to a decrease of 11.7 Immigrants from Chile.
Ute Integration in Immigrants from Chile Communities

Ute vs Immigrants from Chile Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,651 compared to $46,213, a difference of 26.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $103,412, a difference of 23.2%), and median household income ($72,402 compared to $88,388, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $52,440, a difference of 4.9%), wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 8.0%), and median male earnings ($48,899 compared to $55,954, a difference of 14.4%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Chile Income
Income MetricUteImmigrants from Chile
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,651
Exceptional
$46,213
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,596
Excellent
$105,655
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,402
Excellent
$88,388
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,051
Excellent
$47,697
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,899
Excellent
$55,954
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,960
Good
$40,353
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,997
Good
$52,440
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,166
Excellent
$97,159
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,937
Excellent
$103,412
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,949
Excellent
$62,354
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.8%
Average
25.7%

Ute vs Immigrants from Chile Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (16.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 46.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 43.2%), and single female poverty (28.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 41.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 2.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and single father poverty (18.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 18.1%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Chile Poverty
Poverty MetricUteImmigrants from Chile
Poverty
Tragic
16.9%
Average
12.2%
Families
Tragic
12.1%
Average
8.9%
Males
Tragic
16.2%
Average
11.1%
Females
Tragic
17.5%
Average
13.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.4%
Exceptional
19.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.9%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Excellent
16.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Good
15.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Good
15.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.8%
Good
15.9%
Single Males
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Tragic
28.4%
Exceptional
20.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.7%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.4%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
11.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
13.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Good
11.5%

Ute vs Immigrants from Chile Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 40.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 33.3%), and male unemployment (6.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.0%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Chile Unemployment
Unemployment MetricUteImmigrants from Chile
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Average
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
18.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.5%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.0%
Good
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Fair
5.5%

Ute vs Immigrants from Chile Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.50%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 6.5%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Chile Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricUteImmigrants from Chile
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
60.9%
Exceptional
65.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.7%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
37.1%
Tragic
34.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.8%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.8%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
78.9%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.4%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
76.6%
Exceptional
83.2%

Ute vs Immigrants from Chile Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 35.0%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 13.6%), and average family size (3.49 compared to 3.24, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.33%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.5%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Chile Family Structure
Family Structure MetricUteImmigrants from Chile
Family Households
Average
64.3%
Good
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Good
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.4%
Average
46.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.49
Good
3.24
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.1%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.9%
Fair
46.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.0%
Good
31.2%

Ute vs Immigrants from Chile Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 44.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 20.4%), and no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.41%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.5%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Chile Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricUteImmigrants from Chile
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.6%
Poor
11.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Poor
89.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Poor
54.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Poor
18.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Poor
6.1%

Ute vs Immigrants from Chile Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 43.1%), bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 32.2%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.020%), 5th grade (97.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.29%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Chile Education Level
Education Level MetricUteImmigrants from Chile
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Fair
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Poor
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Poor
97.4%
5th Grade
Good
97.4%
Poor
97.2%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Average
96.1%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Average
95.8%
Tragic
95.4%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Poor
94.5%
10th Grade
Fair
93.4%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Fair
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.2%
Fair
88.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.8%
Average
85.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.2%
Excellent
66.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.8%
Exceptional
61.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
49.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.9%
Exceptional
40.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
16.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.1%

Ute vs Immigrants from Chile Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 49.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 32.2%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.7%).
Ute vs Immigrants from Chile Disability
Disability MetricUteImmigrants from Chile
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.86%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.3%
Exceptional
22.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.6%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Exceptional
2.4%