Ute vs Cheyenne Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cheyenne
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ute

Cheyenne

Fair
Poor
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,791
SOCIAL INDEX
15.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
287th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cheyenne Integration in Ute Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,488,716 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cheyenne within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.120. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Cheyenne. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to a decrease of 11.0 Cheyenne.
Ute Integration in Cheyenne Communities

Ute vs Cheyenne Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 19.1%), householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $45,275, a difference of 10.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $76,362, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($41,051 compared to $40,233, a difference of 2.0%), median female earnings ($34,960 compared to $35,673, a difference of 2.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,949 compared to $54,096, a difference of 2.2%).
Ute vs Cheyenne Income
Income MetricUteCheyenne
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,651
Tragic
$35,276
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,596
Tragic
$81,385
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,402
Tragic
$66,974
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,051
Tragic
$40,233
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,899
Tragic
$46,062
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,960
Tragic
$35,673
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,997
Tragic
$45,275
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,166
Tragic
$79,152
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,937
Tragic
$76,362
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,949
Tragic
$54,096
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.8%
Exceptional
23.3%

Ute vs Cheyenne Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 46.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (21.8% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 20.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (15.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 2.7%), receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 6.8%).
Ute vs Cheyenne Poverty
Poverty MetricUteCheyenne
Poverty
Tragic
16.9%
Tragic
18.9%
Families
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
14.3%
Males
Tragic
16.2%
Tragic
17.6%
Females
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
20.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.4%
Tragic
28.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
19.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Tragic
28.3%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Tragic
25.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
25.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
26.3%
Single Males
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
16.1%
Single Females
Tragic
28.4%
Tragic
30.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
16.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.7%
Tragic
38.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
9.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
13.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
14.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
14.3%

Ute vs Cheyenne Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 133.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 72.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 70.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.6%), female unemployment (6.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 10.1%).
Ute vs Cheyenne Unemployment
Unemployment MetricUteCheyenne
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
8.0%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
9.8%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
6.6%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
14.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
22.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
8.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
8.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
16.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
7.8%

Ute vs Cheyenne Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (78.9% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.9% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (79.4% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.62%).
Ute vs Cheyenne Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricUteCheyenne
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
60.9%
Tragic
62.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.7%
Tragic
74.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
37.1%
Exceptional
37.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.8%
Tragic
73.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.8%
Tragic
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
78.9%
Tragic
81.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.4%
Tragic
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
76.6%
Tragic
77.6%

Ute vs Cheyenne Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 25.3%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 13.8%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.49 compared to 3.47, a difference of 0.45%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households (64.3% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 1.9%).
Ute vs Cheyenne Family Structure
Family Structure MetricUteCheyenne
Family Households
Average
64.3%
Tragic
63.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.4%
Tragic
42.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.49
Exceptional
3.47
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
8.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.9%
Tragic
42.2%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
13.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.0%
Tragic
41.3%

Ute vs Cheyenne Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 5.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.0%).
Ute vs Cheyenne Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricUteCheyenne
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
11.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Poor
54.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Exceptional
22.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Exceptional
8.3%

Ute vs Cheyenne Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 27.0%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 13.2%), and no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.0% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.080%), 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.080%), and associate's degree (38.6% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 0.090%).
Ute vs Cheyenne Education Level
Education Level MetricUteCheyenne
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Good
97.4%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Average
96.1%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Average
95.8%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Average
94.9%
10th Grade
Fair
93.4%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Tragic
91.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Tragic
89.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.2%
Tragic
87.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.8%
Tragic
82.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.2%
Tragic
60.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.8%
Tragic
54.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Tragic
38.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.9%
Tragic
29.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
11.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Tragic
3.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
1.6%

Ute vs Cheyenne Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 76.2%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 28.9%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (13.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 1.9%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and disability age over 75 (52.6% compared to 50.9%, a difference of 3.3%).
Ute vs Cheyenne Disability
Disability MetricUteCheyenne
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Tragic
13.0%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.86%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
13.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.3%
Tragic
31.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.6%
Tragic
50.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
3.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
4.0%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Tragic
17.8%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
6.9%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%