Ute vs Apache Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Apache
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ute

Apache

Fair
Poor
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,423
SOCIAL INDEX
11.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
309th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Apache Integration in Ute Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,550,988 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Apache within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.166. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.146% in Apache. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to an increase of 145.5 Apache.
Ute Integration in Apache Communities

Ute vs Apache Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Apache communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 13.1%), median male earnings ($48,899 compared to $46,429, a difference of 5.3%), and per capita income ($36,651 compared to $34,886, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,960 compared to $34,895, a difference of 0.19%), householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $49,395, a difference of 1.2%), and median earnings ($41,051 compared to $40,388, a difference of 1.6%).
Ute vs Apache Income
Income MetricUteApache
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,651
Tragic
$34,886
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,596
Tragic
$84,451
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,402
Tragic
$70,927
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,051
Tragic
$40,388
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,899
Tragic
$46,429
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,960
Tragic
$34,895
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,997
Tragic
$49,395
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,166
Tragic
$80,260
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,937
Tragic
$82,184
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,949
Tragic
$54,668
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.8%
Exceptional
24.5%

Ute vs Apache Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Apache communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 39.1%), single male poverty (15.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 37.6%), and single father poverty (18.5% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (35.7% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 2.5%), single female poverty (28.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 3.6%).
Ute vs Apache Poverty
Poverty MetricUteApache
Poverty
Tragic
16.9%
Tragic
18.4%
Families
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
14.7%
Males
Tragic
16.2%
Tragic
17.7%
Females
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
19.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.4%
Tragic
26.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
20.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Tragic
25.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Tragic
23.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
24.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
23.8%
Single Males
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Tragic
28.4%
Tragic
27.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
24.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.7%
Tragic
36.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
9.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
13.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
15.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
18.3%

Ute vs Apache Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Apache communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 90.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 57.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 52.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 4.1%).
Ute vs Apache Unemployment
Unemployment MetricUteApache
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
7.4%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
8.6%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
6.6%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
13.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
18.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
12.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Tragic
9.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
12.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
7.9%

Ute vs Apache Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Apache communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 30-34 (78.9% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.9% compared to 60.7%, a difference of 0.30%).
Ute vs Apache Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricUteApache
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
60.9%
Tragic
60.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.7%
Tragic
73.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
37.1%
Poor
35.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.8%
Tragic
72.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.8%
Tragic
79.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
78.9%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.4%
Tragic
77.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
76.6%
Tragic
77.1%

Ute vs Apache Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Apache communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 20.8%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 10.9%), and single father households (3.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.49 compared to 3.46, a difference of 0.75%), married-couple households (44.4% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and currently married (43.9% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 1.5%).
Ute vs Apache Family Structure
Family Structure MetricUteApache
Family Households
Average
64.3%
Exceptional
66.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Exceptional
29.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.4%
Tragic
43.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.49
Exceptional
3.46
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
7.9%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.9%
Tragic
43.2%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.0%
Tragic
39.9%

Ute vs Apache Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Apache communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 18.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 7.1%), and no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.46%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
Ute vs Apache Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricUteApache
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.6%
Poor
11.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Poor
89.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Fair
55.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Exceptional
21.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Exceptional
7.4%

Ute vs Apache Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Apache communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 30.2%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 13.4%), and bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.080%), 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and 6th grade (97.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.090%).
Ute vs Apache Education Level
Education Level MetricUteApache
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Good
98.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Good
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Good
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Good
97.8%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Good
97.6%
5th Grade
Good
97.4%
Average
97.4%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Average
97.1%
7th Grade
Average
96.1%
Fair
95.9%
8th Grade
Average
95.8%
Poor
95.5%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Fair
93.4%
Tragic
92.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Tragic
90.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Tragic
87.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.2%
Tragic
85.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.8%
Tragic
80.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.2%
Tragic
58.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.8%
Tragic
51.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Tragic
36.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.9%
Tragic
28.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
11.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Tragic
3.5%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
1.5%

Ute vs Apache Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Apache communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 136.1%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 24.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (52.6% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 1.9%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 7.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 8.7%).
Ute vs Apache Disability
Disability MetricUteApache
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Tragic
13.9%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
14.0%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Tragic
13.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.86%
Tragic
2.0%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
14.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.3%
Tragic
29.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.6%
Tragic
53.6%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
3.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
4.1%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Tragic
18.6%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
7.4%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Tragic
2.7%