Ute vs African Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
African
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ute

Africans

Fair
Tragic
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
624
SOCIAL INDEX
3.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
341st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

African Integration in Ute Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,545,497 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Africans within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.713. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.103% in Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to an increase of 102.8 Africans.
Ute Integration in African Communities

Ute vs African Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and African communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 21.1%), householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $46,838, a difference of 6.7%), and median female earnings ($34,960 compared to $36,530, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($87,596 compared to $87,820, a difference of 0.26%), median household income ($72,402 compared to $72,650, a difference of 0.34%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $84,925, a difference of 1.2%).
Ute vs African Income
Income MetricUteAfrican
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,651
Tragic
$37,785
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,596
Tragic
$87,820
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,402
Tragic
$72,650
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,051
Tragic
$41,955
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,899
Tragic
$47,994
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,960
Tragic
$36,530
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,997
Tragic
$46,838
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,166
Tragic
$78,986
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,937
Tragic
$84,925
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,949
Tragic
$53,711
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.8%
Exceptional
22.9%

Ute vs African Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and African communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (28.4% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 14.8%), male poverty (16.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 14.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (21.8% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 0.59%), child poverty among boys under 16 (21.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.69%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.79%).
Ute vs African Poverty
Poverty MetricUteAfrican
Poverty
Tragic
16.9%
Tragic
15.6%
Families
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
11.8%
Males
Tragic
16.2%
Tragic
14.2%
Females
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
16.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.4%
Tragic
22.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
17.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Tragic
22.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Tragic
21.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
21.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
21.9%
Single Males
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
14.7%
Single Females
Tragic
28.4%
Tragic
24.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
18.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.7%
Tragic
33.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
12.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
13.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
15.1%

Ute vs African Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 48.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 41.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.37%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.65%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.92%).
Ute vs African Unemployment
Unemployment MetricUteAfrican
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.1%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
6.3%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
5.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
13.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
19.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
11.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.5%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
10.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.5%

Ute vs African Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (60.9% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (78.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 3.0%).
Ute vs African Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricUteAfrican
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
60.9%
Tragic
64.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.7%
Tragic
77.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
37.1%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.8%
Average
75.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.8%
Tragic
83.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
78.9%
Tragic
83.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.4%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
76.6%
Tragic
80.5%

Ute vs African Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and African communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 20.7%), births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 20.3%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 3.5%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 4.7%).
Ute vs African Family Structure
Family Structure MetricUteAfrican
Family Households
Average
64.3%
Tragic
62.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Poor
27.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.4%
Tragic
40.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.49
Excellent
3.25
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
8.2%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.9%
Tragic
41.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
13.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.0%
Tragic
39.7%

Ute vs African Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and African communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 49.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 24.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 1.1%), no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 9.2%).
Ute vs African Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricUteAfrican
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
12.3%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Tragic
87.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Tragic
51.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Tragic
18.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Tragic
5.8%

Ute vs African Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and African communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 28.5%), master's degree (11.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 9.9%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.1% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.27%), 5th grade (97.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.30%).
Ute vs African Education Level
Education Level MetricUteAfrican
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Fair
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Poor
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Poor
97.4%
5th Grade
Good
97.4%
Poor
97.2%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Poor
96.9%
7th Grade
Average
96.1%
Poor
95.8%
8th Grade
Average
95.8%
Poor
95.4%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Tragic
94.5%
10th Grade
Fair
93.4%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Tragic
91.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Tragic
89.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.2%
Tragic
87.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.8%
Tragic
83.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.2%
Tragic
61.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.8%
Tragic
55.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Tragic
41.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.9%
Tragic
32.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
12.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
1.6%

Ute vs African Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and African communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 59.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 18.0%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (13.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.8%).
Ute vs African Disability
Disability MetricUteAfrican
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Tragic
13.0%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
12.6%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.86%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
13.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.3%
Tragic
26.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.6%
Tragic
48.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Fair
3.0%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Tragic
18.6%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
7.0%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Tragic
2.7%