Ugandan vs Tsimshian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Ugandan
Tsimshian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Ugandans
Tsimshian
6,220
SOCIAL INDEX
59.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
159th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tsimshian Integration in Ugandan Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 9,708,660 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Ugandan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.676. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ugandans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.213% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ugandans corresponds to an increase of 212.9 Tsimshian.
Ugandan vs Tsimshian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($55,290 compared to $48,836, a difference of 13.2%), per capita income ($45,047 compared to $40,344, a difference of 11.7%), and median earnings ($47,854 compared to $43,695, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 0.76%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,667 compared to $97,809, a difference of 1.2%), and median female earnings ($40,889 compared to $39,530, a difference of 3.4%).
Income Metric | Ugandan | Tsimshian |
Per Capita Income | Excellent $45,047 | Tragic $40,344 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,541 | Fair $101,543 |
Median Household Income | Excellent $87,557 | Fair $83,346 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,854 | Tragic $43,695 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,290 | Tragic $48,836 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,889 | Average $39,530 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,923 | Exceptional $54,649 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $96,667 | Excellent $97,809 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,472 | Poor $96,783 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $61,177 | Tragic $58,202 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.1% | Exceptional 23.9% |
Ugandan vs Tsimshian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (17.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 49.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 35.2%), and receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (13.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.98%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 4.7%).
Poverty Metric | Ugandan | Tsimshian |
Poverty | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 13.0% |
Families | Fair 9.3% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Poor 14.0% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.1% | Tragic 21.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.4% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Poor 18.0% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Poor 17.1% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Poor 17.3% | Average 16.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Poor 17.2% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.3% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Good 20.8% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Single Fathers | Average 16.3% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Mothers | Good 28.8% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Poor 11.4% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 11.9% | Tragic 16.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Fair 12.2% | Tragic 15.7% |
Ugandan vs Tsimshian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 180.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 72.8%), and male unemployment (5.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 53.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.61%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Ugandan | Tsimshian |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 7.2% |
Males | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 8.5% |
Females | Fair 5.3% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Tragic 16.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Tragic 18.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Poor 6.8% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.9% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 10.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.6% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 12.0% | Tragic 11.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.9% | Poor 5.6% |
Ugandan vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 2.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Ugandan | Tsimshian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.4% | Tragic 64.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.6% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.9% | Excellent 37.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.4% | Tragic 72.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.9% | Exceptional 88.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.8% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.3% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.7% | Tragic 77.4% |
Ugandan vs Tsimshian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.1% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 40.1%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 24.8%), and divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.48%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (44.2% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 7.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Ugandan | Tsimshian |
Family Households | Tragic 61.7% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.8% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Good 2.3% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.5% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.2% | Exceptional 47.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 13.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.1% | Tragic 42.2% |
Ugandan vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 33.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 7.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Ugandan | Tsimshian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.9% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.5% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.8% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.7% | Fair 6.2% |
Ugandan vs Tsimshian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 60.8%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 58.4%), and master's degree (17.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 50.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.1% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 0.69%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 0.88%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.90%).
Education Level Metric | Ugandan | Tsimshian |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.0% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.9% |
Kindergarten | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.8% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.8% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.8% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Exceptional 98.8% |
4th Grade | Average 97.6% | Exceptional 98.6% |
5th Grade | Average 97.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
6th Grade | Good 97.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
7th Grade | Good 96.2% | Exceptional 97.8% |
8th Grade | Good 95.9% | Exceptional 99.0% |
9th Grade | Good 95.1% | Exceptional 97.0% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.0% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Excellent 92.9% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Exceptional 91.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Good 86.1% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Excellent 66.8% | Poor 64.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 61.2% | Poor 57.9% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.7% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.8% | Tragic 28.8% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.1% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 1.4% |
Ugandan vs Tsimshian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 111.9%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 63.9%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 53.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 6.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.3%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 12.7%).
Disability Metric | Ugandan | Tsimshian |
Disability | Excellent 11.4% | Tragic 16.1% |
Males | Excellent 11.0% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 16.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 2.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Average 11.3% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 22.7% | Tragic 32.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Tragic 59.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 4.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.3% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 8.8% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |