Ugandan vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Ugandan
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Ugandans
Chickasaw
6,220
SOCIAL INDEX
59.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
159th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Ugandan Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,688,684 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Ugandan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.092. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ugandans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ugandans corresponds to an increase of 12.5 Chickasaw.
![Ugandan Integration in Chickasaw Communities](/correlation-charts/comparison/ugandans-vs-chickasaw/ugandans-vs-chickasaw-community-integration.webp)
Ugandan vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,472 compared to $82,193, a difference of 25.9%), median household income ($87,557 compared to $70,005, a difference of 25.1%), and median family income ($106,541 compared to $85,356, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 12.9%), householder income under 25 years ($50,923 compared to $44,763, a difference of 13.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,177 compared to $53,732, a difference of 13.9%).
![Ugandan vs Chickasaw Income](/correlation-charts/comparison/ugandans-vs-chickasaw/ugandans-vs-chickasaw-income.webp)
Income Metric | Ugandan | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Excellent $45,047 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,541 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Excellent $87,557 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,854 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,290 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,889 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,923 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $96,667 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,472 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $61,177 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.1% | Tragic 27.2% |
Ugandan vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.3% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 32.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 27.3%), and single female poverty (20.8% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.1%), receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 6.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 7.0%).
![Ugandan vs Chickasaw Poverty](/correlation-charts/comparison/ugandans-vs-chickasaw/ugandans-vs-chickasaw-poverty.webp)
Poverty Metric | Ugandan | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Fair 9.3% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Poor 14.0% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.1% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.4% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Poor 18.0% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Poor 17.1% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Poor 17.3% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Poor 17.2% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.3% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Good 20.8% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Average 16.3% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Good 28.8% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Poor 11.4% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 11.9% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Fair 12.2% | Tragic 13.1% |
Ugandan vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 39.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 26.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.74%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.90%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.6%).
![Ugandan vs Chickasaw Unemployment](/correlation-charts/comparison/ugandans-vs-chickasaw/ugandans-vs-chickasaw-unemployment.webp)
Unemployment Metric | Ugandan | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 5.5% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Fair 5.3% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Poor 6.8% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.8% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.6% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 12.0% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.9% | Good 5.4% |
Ugandan vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.7%).
![Ugandan vs Chickasaw Labor Participation](/correlation-charts/comparison/ugandans-vs-chickasaw/ugandans-vs-chickasaw-labor-force.webp)
Labor Participation Metric | Ugandan | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.4% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.6% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.9% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.4% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.9% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.8% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.3% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.7% | Tragic 79.0% |
Ugandan vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.1% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 20.6%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 20.5%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households (61.7% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 4.4%).
![Ugandan vs Chickasaw Family Structure](/correlation-charts/comparison/ugandans-vs-chickasaw/ugandans-vs-chickasaw-family-structure.webp)
Family Structure Metric | Ugandan | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Tragic 61.7% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.8% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Good 2.3% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.5% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.2% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.1% | Tragic 36.3% |
Ugandan vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 45.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 30.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 10.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 24.8%).
![Ugandan vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability](/correlation-charts/comparison/ugandans-vs-chickasaw/ugandans-vs-chickasaw-vehicle-availability.webp)
Vehicle Availability Metric | Ugandan | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.9% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.5% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Ugandan vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 52.2%), master's degree (17.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 50.0%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 47.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.0% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.40%).
![Ugandan vs Chickasaw Education Level](/correlation-charts/comparison/ugandans-vs-chickasaw/ugandans-vs-chickasaw-education-level.webp)
Education Level Metric | Ugandan | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.0% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Average 97.6% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Average 97.4% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Good 97.1% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Good 96.2% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Good 95.9% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Good 95.1% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.0% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Excellent 92.9% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Good 86.1% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Excellent 66.8% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 61.2% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.7% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.8% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.1% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 1.5% |
Ugandan vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 55.9%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 53.1%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 52.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.81%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 10.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 11.1%).
![Ugandan vs Chickasaw Disability](/correlation-charts/comparison/ugandans-vs-chickasaw/ugandans-vs-chickasaw-disability.webp)
Disability Metric | Ugandan | Chickasaw |
Disability | Excellent 11.4% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Excellent 11.0% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Average 11.3% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 22.7% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.3% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.9% |