Tsimshian vs Lithuanian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Lithuanian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Tsimshian
Lithuanians
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,827
SOCIAL INDEX
85.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
46th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Lithuanian Integration in Tsimshian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,039,906 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.412. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.045% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to a decrease of 45.2 Lithuanians.
Tsimshian vs Lithuanian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($48,836 compared to $61,228, a difference of 25.4%), per capita income ($40,344 compared to $49,448, a difference of 22.6%), and wage/income gap (23.9% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,649 compared to $53,552, a difference of 2.1%), median female earnings ($39,530 compared to $42,108, a difference of 6.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,809 compared to $105,223, a difference of 7.6%).
Income Metric | Tsimshian | Lithuanian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $40,344 | Exceptional $49,448 |
Median Family Income | Fair $101,543 | Exceptional $115,395 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,346 | Exceptional $93,852 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,695 | Exceptional $50,991 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,836 | Exceptional $61,228 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,530 | Exceptional $42,108 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,649 | Exceptional $53,552 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,809 | Exceptional $105,223 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Poor $96,783 | Exceptional $112,484 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,202 | Exceptional $65,209 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.9% | Tragic 28.7% |
Tsimshian vs Lithuanian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 62.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 51.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.55%), single mother poverty (26.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 3.1%).
Poverty Metric | Tsimshian | Lithuanian |
Poverty | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Females | Good 13.1% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.2% | Exceptional 18.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.1% | Exceptional 13.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.4% | Exceptional 14.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.5% | Exceptional 13.9% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.1% | Fair 13.0% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.1% | Exceptional 19.2% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 17.3% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.8% | Exceptional 27.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.8% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 15.7% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Tsimshian vs Lithuanian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (13.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 156.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (18.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 75.8%), and male unemployment (8.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 70.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 6.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Tsimshian | Lithuanian |
Unemployment | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Tragic 8.5% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.5% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.3% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 18.0% | Good 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.0% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 13.8% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.2% | Excellent 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.5% | Average 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.5% | Tragic 9.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.6% | Fair 7.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.6% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Tsimshian vs Lithuanian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.54%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Tsimshian | Lithuanian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.5% | Poor 64.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Exceptional 80.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.4% | Exceptional 40.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.3% | Exceptional 77.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 88.7% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.8% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.4% | Exceptional 83.6% |
Tsimshian vs Lithuanian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 42.6%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 36.9%), and divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.7% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 0.27%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and currently married (47.7% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 2.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Tsimshian | Lithuanian |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.1% | Fair 64.0% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Tragic 26.6% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.7% | Exceptional 48.9% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Tragic 3.10 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.0% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.7% | Exceptional 49.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.2% | Exceptional 29.6% |
Tsimshian vs Lithuanian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 5.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.31%), no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Tsimshian | Lithuanian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.4% | Exceptional 91.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.7% | Exceptional 58.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.1% | Excellent 20.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Average 6.3% |
Tsimshian vs Lithuanian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 69.2%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 60.7%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 55.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.18%), 10th grade (95.6% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.20%), and 6th grade (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.23%).
Education Level Metric | Tsimshian | Lithuanian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.4% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.9% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.5% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 99.0% | Exceptional 97.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Exceptional 96.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Exceptional 95.8% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Exceptional 94.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.9% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.3% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.6% | Exceptional 88.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.3% | Exceptional 68.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Poor 57.9% | Exceptional 62.9% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 50.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.8% | Exceptional 42.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Tsimshian vs Lithuanian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 57.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 54.8%), and disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 54.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 6.2%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 6.3%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.0%).
Disability Metric | Tsimshian | Lithuanian |
Disability | Tragic 16.1% | Poor 11.9% |
Males | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 11.6% |
Females | Tragic 16.8% | Average 12.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.7% | Excellent 10.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.9% | Exceptional 21.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 59.2% | Exceptional 45.1% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.7% | Tragic 3.4% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Exceptional 16.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.8% | Excellent 6.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.4% |