Tongan vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Tongan
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Tongans
Chickasaw
7,132
SOCIAL INDEX
68.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
130th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Tongan Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,585,586 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Tongan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.320. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tongans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tongans corresponds to an increase of 13.0 Chickasaw.
![Tongan Integration in Chickasaw Communities](/correlation-charts/comparison/tongans-vs-chickasaw/tongans-vs-chickasaw-community-integration.webp)
Tongan vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Tongan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($93,076 compared to $70,005, a difference of 33.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,643 compared to $82,193, a difference of 32.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,604 compared to $77,929, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 1.1%), median male earnings ($53,218 compared to $47,832, a difference of 11.3%), and median female earnings ($38,288 compared to $34,414, a difference of 11.3%).
![Tongan vs Chickasaw Income](/correlation-charts/comparison/tongans-vs-chickasaw/tongans-vs-chickasaw-income.webp)
Income Metric | Tongan | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $41,693 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $105,967 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $93,076 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Fair $45,665 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Fair $53,218 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,288 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $56,972 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $99,604 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $108,643 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $68,235 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.5% | Tragic 27.2% |
Tongan vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tongan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (10.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 56.1%), single father poverty (12.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 55.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 54.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 14.7%), and married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.2%).
![Tongan vs Chickasaw Poverty](/correlation-charts/comparison/tongans-vs-chickasaw/tongans-vs-chickasaw-poverty.webp)
Poverty Metric | Tongan | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 17.1% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.8% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.5% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.3% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 13.1% |
Tongan vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tongan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 41.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 30.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.68%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 4.7%).
![Tongan vs Chickasaw Unemployment](/correlation-charts/comparison/tongans-vs-chickasaw/tongans-vs-chickasaw-unemployment.webp)
Unemployment Metric | Tongan | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.9% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 5.5% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.4% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.9% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 6.7% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 5.4% |
Tongan vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tongan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.5% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (41.2% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.4%).
![Tongan vs Chickasaw Labor Participation](/correlation-charts/comparison/tongans-vs-chickasaw/tongans-vs-chickasaw-labor-force.webp)
Labor Participation Metric | Tongan | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.5% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.3% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.2% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.9% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.7% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.5% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.6% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Excellent 83.1% | Tragic 79.0% |
Tongan vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tongan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 28.3%), births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 27.9%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 3.7%), family households (69.6% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 9.2%).
![Tongan vs Chickasaw Family Structure](/correlation-charts/comparison/tongans-vs-chickasaw/tongans-vs-chickasaw-family-structure.webp)
Family Structure Metric | Tongan | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 69.6% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 31.2% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 51.6% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.49 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.3% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.4% | Tragic 36.3% |
Tongan vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tongan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 35.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 19.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.65%), 2 or more vehicles in household (63.5% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 7.6%), and no vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 9.6%).
![Tongan vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability](/correlation-charts/comparison/tongans-vs-chickasaw/tongans-vs-chickasaw-vehicle-availability.webp)
Vehicle Availability Metric | Tongan | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.9% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 63.5% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 26.5% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Tongan vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tongan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 34.3%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 14.1%), and bachelor's degree (34.3% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.050%), 11th grade (92.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.7% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.42%).
![Tongan vs Chickasaw Education Level](/correlation-charts/comparison/tongans-vs-chickasaw/tongans-vs-chickasaw-education-level.webp)
Education Level Metric | Tongan | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.4% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.3% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Poor 92.2% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Poor 90.7% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 88.4% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Fair 64.5% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Poor 57.8% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.0% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 34.3% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Poor 1.7% | Tragic 1.5% |
Tongan vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tongan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 60.0%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 54.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 53.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 4.2%), disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 26.9%).
![Tongan vs Chickasaw Disability](/correlation-charts/comparison/tongans-vs-chickasaw/tongans-vs-chickasaw-disability.webp)
Disability Metric | Tongan | Chickasaw |
Disability | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Excellent 6.4% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.8% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.3% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Good 2.9% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.8% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.9% |