Tohono O'odham vs Luxembourger Community Comparison
COMPARE
Tohono O'odham
Luxembourger
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Tohono O'odham
Luxembourgers
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Luxembourger Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,078,554 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.672. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to an increase of 11.0 Luxembourgers.
Tohono O'odham vs Luxembourger Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $45,663, a difference of 50.9%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $106,183, a difference of 47.1%), and median male earnings ($39,543 compared to $56,300, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $50,379, a difference of 11.3%), median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $39,891, a difference of 20.1%), and wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 23.9%).
Income Metric | Tohono O'odham | Luxembourger |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,256 | Exceptional $45,663 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $72,193 | Excellent $106,183 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $61,663 | Good $86,418 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $36,349 | Excellent $47,640 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $39,543 | Excellent $56,300 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,205 | Average $39,891 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,248 | Tragic $50,379 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $69,068 | Excellent $97,237 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,774 | Excellent $103,536 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $49,121 | Average $60,967 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.1% | Tragic 27.4% |
Tohono O'odham vs Luxembourger Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 189.3%), family poverty (20.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 182.5%), and male poverty (22.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 140.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 28.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.0% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 48.6%), and single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 50.9%).
Poverty Metric | Tohono O'odham | Luxembourger |
Poverty | Tragic 24.4% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Families | Tragic 20.4% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Males | Tragic 22.9% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Females | Tragic 25.9% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 31.0% | Tragic 20.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 24.7% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 29.5% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 31.7% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 31.6% | Exceptional 13.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 31.6% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 21.6% | Tragic 13.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 34.2% | Excellent 20.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 22.0% | Tragic 17.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 43.0% | Excellent 28.5% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.2% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 20.8% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 19.1% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 21.5% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Tohono O'odham vs Luxembourger Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (10.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 124.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 106.5%), and unemployment (8.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 104.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 16.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 26.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Tohono O'odham | Luxembourger |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.9% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Males | Tragic 10.2% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Females | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 22.1% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 8.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 10.2% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.7% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 8.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Tohono O'odham vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 44.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 16.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 11.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 12.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 13.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Tohono O'odham | Luxembourger |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.2% | Exceptional 66.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 70.4% | Exceptional 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.3% | Exceptional 45.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 68.6% | Exceptional 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 77.5% | Exceptional 86.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 77.7% | Exceptional 86.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.1% | Exceptional 86.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 75.1% | Exceptional 85.0% |
Tohono O'odham vs Luxembourger Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 71.4%), births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 69.4%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 64.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 3.7%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 5.9%), and family households (67.1% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 6.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Tohono O'odham | Luxembourger |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.1% | Tragic 63.3% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.0% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 37.9% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.53 | Tragic 3.10 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.8% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 9.1% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Currently Married | Tragic 36.8% | Exceptional 49.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 49.8% | Exceptional 29.4% |
Tohono O'odham vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 191.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 18.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.070%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 10.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 11.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Tohono O'odham | Luxembourger |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 5.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.7% | Exceptional 94.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 50.0% | Exceptional 59.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 18.9% | Exceptional 20.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 6.6% | Excellent 6.6% |
Tohono O'odham vs Luxembourger Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 62.8%), professional degree (2.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 62.2%), and master's degree (9.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 58.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.64%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.64%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.65%).
Education Level Metric | Tohono O'odham | Luxembourger |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Fair 97.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Fair 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Poor 97.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Exceptional 97.2% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Exceptional 97.0% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.6% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.1% | Exceptional 95.4% |
11th Grade | Tragic 87.6% | Exceptional 94.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.7% | Exceptional 93.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 82.1% | Exceptional 91.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 77.5% | Exceptional 88.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 52.8% | Exceptional 68.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 47.1% | Exceptional 62.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 31.8% | Exceptional 48.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 24.4% | Excellent 39.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.7% | Good 15.3% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.8% | Good 4.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Excellent 1.9% |
Tohono O'odham vs Luxembourger Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 68.5%), disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 66.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 58.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 6.3%), cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 17.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.7%).
Disability Metric | Tohono O'odham | Luxembourger |
Disability | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.0% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.2% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.3% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 36.0% | Exceptional 21.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 56.7% | Exceptional 44.8% |
Vision | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 19.3% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.7% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 2.2% |