Taiwanese vs Choctaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Taiwanese
Choctaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Taiwanese
Choctaw
6,532
SOCIAL INDEX
62.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
151st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Choctaw Integration in Taiwanese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,016,409 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within Taiwanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.741. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Taiwanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.273% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Taiwanese corresponds to an increase of 272.9 Choctaw.
Taiwanese vs Choctaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,492 compared to $78,168, a difference of 29.8%), per capita income ($46,455 compared to $35,999, a difference of 29.0%), and median household income ($89,900 compared to $69,947, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,804 compared to $45,450, a difference of 9.6%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 11.9%), and median male earnings ($55,556 compared to $47,729, a difference of 16.4%).
Income Metric | Taiwanese | Choctaw |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,455 | Tragic $35,999 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $107,295 | Tragic $84,835 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,900 | Tragic $69,947 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,902 | Tragic $40,270 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,556 | Tragic $47,729 |
Median Female Earnings | Excellent $40,576 | Tragic $33,775 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $49,804 | Tragic $45,450 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $101,492 | Tragic $78,168 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $104,180 | Tragic $82,287 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Excellent $62,894 | Tragic $53,060 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.1% | Tragic 28.1% |
Taiwanese vs Choctaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 62.1%), single male poverty (10.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 55.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 53.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.31%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 14.2%).
Poverty Metric | Taiwanese | Choctaw |
Poverty | Good 12.2% | Tragic 15.6% |
Families | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 11.6% |
Males | Good 11.0% | Tragic 14.4% |
Females | Good 13.1% | Tragic 16.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.2% | Tragic 24.3% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 18.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 23.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 21.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 21.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.6% | Tragic 21.1% |
Single Males | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 17.0% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.4% | Tragic 27.2% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 20.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.5% | Tragic 36.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.2% | Poor 11.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.6% | Fair 12.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.0% | Tragic 13.6% |
Taiwanese vs Choctaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 61.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 53.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Taiwanese | Choctaw |
Unemployment | Average 5.3% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.5% | Tragic 19.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 10.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 6.6% | Fair 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 9.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 6.5% | Tragic 9.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Taiwanese vs Choctaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 12.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 5.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Taiwanese | Choctaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.2% | Tragic 61.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.2% | Tragic 75.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 33.8% | Exceptional 38.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Fair 74.7% | Fair 74.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Fair 84.6% | Tragic 81.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Tragic 78.2% |
Taiwanese vs Choctaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 27.3%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 23.5%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.080%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.50%), and currently married (45.8% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Taiwanese | Choctaw |
Family Households | Tragic 63.3% | Exceptional 64.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Exceptional 28.1% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Fair 46.0% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Fair 3.21 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.7% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Poor 45.8% | Fair 46.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 14.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.0% | Tragic 36.9% |
Taiwanese vs Choctaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 47.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 14.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 10.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 11.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Taiwanese | Choctaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.4% | Exceptional 92.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.9% | Exceptional 59.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.0% | Exceptional 23.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Taiwanese vs Choctaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 54.2%), master's degree (16.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 45.8%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (87.9% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 0.14%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.24%), and 11th grade (91.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.47%).
Education Level Metric | Taiwanese | Choctaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.8% | Exceptional 96.5% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.7% | Exceptional 96.2% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.6% | Excellent 95.1% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.5% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.3% | Tragic 91.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.0% | Tragic 89.8% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.9% | Tragic 87.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.7% | Tragic 83.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 66.4% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Excellent 60.7% | Tragic 52.3% |
Associate's Degree | Excellent 47.7% | Tragic 37.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.0% | Tragic 29.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.1% | Tragic 11.0% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 1.4% |
Taiwanese vs Choctaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 71.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 66.7%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 63.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 4.9%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 9.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 26.4%).
Disability Metric | Taiwanese | Choctaw |
Disability | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 15.4% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 15.4% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 15.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.0% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 16.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 22.7% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.2% | Tragic 52.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 3.3% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 18.4% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 8.3% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 3.0% |