Subsaharan African vs Iroquois Community Comparison
COMPARE
Subsaharan African
Iroquois
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Sub-Saharan Africans
Iroquois
977
SOCIAL INDEX
7.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
330th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iroquois Integration in Subsaharan African Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,118,850 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Subsaharan African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.207. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sub-Saharan Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sub-Saharan Africans corresponds to an increase of 2.3 Iroquois.
Subsaharan African vs Iroquois Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 9.9%), median female earnings ($38,391 compared to $36,408, a difference of 5.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,615 compared to $53,737, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,235 compared to $83,682, a difference of 0.66%), median male earnings ($50,408 compared to $49,374, a difference of 2.1%), and per capita income ($40,152 compared to $39,104, a difference of 2.7%).
Income Metric | Subsaharan African | Iroquois |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $40,152 | Tragic $39,104 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $93,748 | Tragic $90,543 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $77,631 | Tragic $74,279 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $44,118 | Tragic $42,430 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,408 | Tragic $49,374 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,391 | Tragic $36,408 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $48,691 | Tragic $47,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $84,235 | Tragic $83,682 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $90,691 | Tragic $87,255 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,615 | Tragic $53,737 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.8% | Excellent 25.1% |
Subsaharan African vs Iroquois Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 12.0%), single mother poverty (31.4% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 11.1%), and single female poverty (23.2% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (14.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.040%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and male poverty (13.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.30%).
Poverty Metric | Subsaharan African | Iroquois |
Poverty | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Tragic 10.9% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.8% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.0% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 17.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 20.8% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.0% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.1% | Tragic 20.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.2% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 16.9% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.4% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.7% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 13.5% |
Subsaharan African vs Iroquois Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 12.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 10.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Subsaharan African | Iroquois |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.8% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Tragic 5.7% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.7% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.1% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.4% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.0% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.7% |
Subsaharan African vs Iroquois Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.7% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.64%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.68%).
Labor Participation Metric | Subsaharan African | Iroquois |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.2% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.4% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.7% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Poor 84.5% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 84.1% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.0% | Tragic 80.6% |
Subsaharan African vs Iroquois Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 12.1%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.6%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.1% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 0.31%), divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.96%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.16, a difference of 2.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Subsaharan African | Iroquois |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Tragic 26.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.6% | Tragic 43.7% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 42.6% | Tragic 44.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.7% | Tragic 38.2% |
Subsaharan African vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 13.2%), no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 11.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.9% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 8.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Subsaharan African | Iroquois |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 12.2% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 87.9% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.9% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.9% | Average 19.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.7% | Good 6.5% |
Subsaharan African vs Iroquois Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 22.3%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 10.9%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.46%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.46%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.47%).
Education Level Metric | Subsaharan African | Iroquois |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.4% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.7% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.1% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.9% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.2% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 63.2% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 57.3% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.9% | Tragic 42.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.8% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Poor 14.2% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Poor 4.1% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Tragic 1.6% |
Subsaharan African vs Iroquois Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 28.3%), male disability (11.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 15.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.50%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.1% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 1.9%).
Disability Metric | Subsaharan African | Iroquois |
Disability | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.1% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.2% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.7% |