Spanish American Indian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,666,325 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Spanish American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.317. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Spanish American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.055% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Spanish American Indians corresponds to an increase of 54.8 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Spanish American Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($34,195 compared to $56,709, a difference of 65.8%), median male earnings ($44,010 compared to $70,146, a difference of 59.4%), and median family income ($85,728 compared to $131,067, a difference of 52.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,573 compared to $62,083, a difference of 11.7%), wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 13.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,077 compared to $71,567, a difference of 34.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Spanish American Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 64.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (20.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 62.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 62.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 1.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and single male poverty (12.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Spanish American Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 49.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 30.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Spanish American Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.4% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.2% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Spanish American Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 58.7%), single father households (2.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 56.9%), and single mother households (7.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 50.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (29.1% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 5.7%), married-couple households (46.6% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 6.5%), and family households (71.2% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Spanish American Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 66.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 40.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.3% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.3%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 11.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.3% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Spanish American Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 161.9%), professional degree (2.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 141.6%), and master's degree (9.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 113.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (95.8% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (95.8% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (95.7% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Spanish American Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 43.2%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 42.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 41.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.9% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 7.4%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 10.8%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.6%).