South American Indian vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison
COMPARE
South American Indian
Immigrants from China
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
South American Indians
Immigrants from China
4,820
SOCIAL INDEX
45.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
193rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from China Integration in South American Indian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,790,510 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within South American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.076. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.026% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South American Indians corresponds to an increase of 26.0 Immigrants from China.
South American Indian vs Immigrants from China Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,497 compared to $119,756, a difference of 24.1%), median male earnings ($54,508 compared to $67,353, a difference of 23.6%), and per capita income ($44,206 compared to $54,264, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 7.8%), householder income under 25 years ($52,979 compared to $57,931, a difference of 9.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,215 compared to $69,174, a difference of 11.2%).
Income Metric | South American Indian | Immigrants from China |
Per Capita Income | Good $44,206 | Exceptional $54,264 |
Median Family Income | Good $103,624 | Exceptional $125,540 |
Median Household Income | Excellent $87,446 | Exceptional $105,335 |
Median Earnings | Good $46,952 | Exceptional $56,638 |
Median Male Earnings | Average $54,508 | Exceptional $67,353 |
Median Female Earnings | Good $40,019 | Exceptional $46,972 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Excellent $52,979 | Exceptional $57,931 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $96,497 | Exceptional $119,756 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $101,171 | Exceptional $122,178 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $62,215 | Exceptional $69,174 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.7% | Poor 26.7% |
South American Indian vs Immigrants from China Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (17.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 27.8%), child poverty among girls under 16 (16.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 24.9%), and receiving food stamps (11.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.27%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.48%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.6%).
Poverty Metric | South American Indian | Immigrants from China |
Poverty | Fair 12.7% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Fair 9.1% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Fair 11.5% | Excellent 10.7% |
Females | Fair 13.7% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.1% | Average 20.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Average 13.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Average 17.4% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Average 16.4% | Exceptional 13.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.5% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Fair 16.8% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.1% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Single Females | Good 20.6% | Exceptional 18.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.7% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Single Mothers | Average 29.3% | Exceptional 26.1% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.3% | Excellent 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Poor 11.4% | Tragic 11.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 13.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Average 11.9% | Exceptional 9.6% |
South American Indian vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 17.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.9%).
Unemployment Metric | South American Indian | Immigrants from China |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.5% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Tragic 5.5% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 5.5% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Average 11.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Good 17.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.8% | Fair 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.8% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Fair 5.6% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Average 4.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.5% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Fair 5.5% | Exceptional 4.9% |
South American Indian vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 14.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.23%).
Labor Participation Metric | South American Indian | Immigrants from China |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.0% | Excellent 65.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Excellent 79.9% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.8% | Tragic 31.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.3% | Tragic 71.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Fair 84.5% | Average 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Average 84.7% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Good 84.5% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 82.9% | Exceptional 83.2% |
South American Indian vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 28.6%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 27.1%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.12%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.1%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.9%).
Family Structure Metric | South American Indian | Immigrants from China |
Family Households | Excellent 64.6% | Excellent 64.7% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.0% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 46.0% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.26 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Excellent 2.3% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Currently Married | Poor 45.8% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.8% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Average 31.7% | Exceptional 24.7% |
South American Indian vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 25.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 4.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | South American Indian | Immigrants from China |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 15.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.0% | Tragic 84.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.9% | Tragic 51.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.1% | Tragic 18.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Average 6.3% | Poor 6.0% |
South American Indian vs Immigrants from China Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 56.4%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 41.5%), and master's degree (15.9% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.3% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.0%), 10th grade (93.1% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.050%), and 8th grade (95.1% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.090%).
Education Level Metric | South American Indian | Immigrants from China |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.8% | Tragic 97.5% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.8% | Tragic 97.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Tragic 97.4% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Tragic 97.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Tragic 97.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 97.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Tragic 96.8% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Tragic 96.4% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.5% | Tragic 95.3% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Tragic 95.0% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Tragic 94.3% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Tragic 93.2% |
11th Grade | Tragic 92.0% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Poor 90.6% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.5% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Exceptional 86.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Average 65.5% | Exceptional 70.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Good 60.0% | Exceptional 66.4% |
Associate's Degree | Good 47.4% | Exceptional 55.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Excellent 39.3% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Master's Degree | Excellent 15.9% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Professional Degree | Excellent 4.8% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Excellent 2.0% | Exceptional 3.1% |
South American Indian vs Immigrants from China Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 38.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 25.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.8%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 3.5%).
Disability Metric | South American Indian | Immigrants from China |
Disability | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Males | Excellent 10.9% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.8% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 0.96% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Excellent 5.5% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Excellent 6.4% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Excellent 10.9% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 23.1% | Exceptional 20.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Good 47.1% | Exceptional 46.3% |
Vision | Average 2.2% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Cognitive | Poor 17.5% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Exceptional 2.3% |