South African vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
South African
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
South Africans
Chinese
8,851
SOCIAL INDEX
86.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
44th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in South African Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,813,215 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within South African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.948. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.044% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South Africans corresponds to an increase of 43.8 Chinese.
South African vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between South African and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,652 compared to $77,465, a difference of 18.0%), householder income under 25 years ($51,383 compared to $58,162, a difference of 13.2%), and per capita income ($50,044 compared to $46,098, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,825 compared to $41,461, a difference of 0.88%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,160 compared to $104,264, a difference of 1.1%), and median family income ($113,229 compared to $116,188, a difference of 2.6%).
Income Metric | South African | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $50,044 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $113,229 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $93,379 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $50,752 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $61,460 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,825 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,383 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $103,160 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $109,719 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,652 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.0% | Average 25.9% |
South African vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South African and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 30.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 28.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.0%), single father poverty (16.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 15.8%).
Poverty Metric | South African | Chinese |
Poverty | Excellent 11.7% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Excellent 12.8% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.1% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Excellent 13.0% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.5% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Average 12.8% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Excellent 20.4% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Good 16.1% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Excellent 28.5% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 9.8% |
South African vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South African and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 27.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 20.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 5.4%).
Unemployment Metric | South African | Chinese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.1% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.9% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.1% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Average 4.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.5% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
South African vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South African and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.74%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.94%).
Labor Participation Metric | South African | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Good 65.3% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Average 36.7% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Average 75.0% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 85.0% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.3% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Fair 82.6% | Exceptional 84.1% |
South African vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South African and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.0%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 8.4%), and family households (63.4% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 0.86%), currently married (47.6% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 5.4%).
Family Structure Metric | South African | Chinese |
Family Households | Tragic 63.4% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.3% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.17 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.6% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.5% | Excellent 30.2% |
South African vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South African and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 42.6%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 24.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 6.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 23.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | South African | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.2% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.0% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.2% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Exceptional 8.8% |
South African vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between South African and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 32.6%), professional degree (5.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 27.7%), and master's degree (18.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.28%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.28%).
Education Level Metric | South African | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.4% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.6% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.5% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.7% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.1% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.4% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 43.6% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.1% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.7% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Fair 1.8% |
South African vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between South African and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 19.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 17.8%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.7%).
Disability Metric | South African | Chinese |
Disability | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Excellent 11.0% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.8% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Good 6.5% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.9% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.5% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Good 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Fair 3.1% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.9% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |