Sierra Leonean vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 81,722,606 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Sierra Leonean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.400. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sierra Leoneans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.196% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sierra Leoneans corresponds to a decrease of 196.2 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,435 compared to $119,756, a difference of 28.2%), per capita income ($43,405 compared to $54,264, a difference of 25.0%), and wage/income gap (21.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,272 compared to $57,931, a difference of 1.1%), householder income over 65 years ($65,038 compared to $69,174, a difference of 6.4%), and median female earnings ($42,868 compared to $46,972, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (17.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 32.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (17.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 30.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (17.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.4%), single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 29.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 23.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.6% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 20.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (68.9% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.70%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.5% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 52.8%), births to unmarried women (34.9% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 41.2%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.30 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (28.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 37.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.59%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 57.8%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 49.5%), and master's degree (16.8% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.1% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.16%), high school diploma (89.1% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 27.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 27.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.94%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.9%).