Sierra Leonean vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Sierra Leonean
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Sierra Leoneans
Chickasaw
4,851
SOCIAL INDEX
46.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
191st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Sierra Leonean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,237,255 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Sierra Leonean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.072. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sierra Leoneans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sierra Leoneans corresponds to a decrease of 5.6 Chickasaw.
Sierra Leonean vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($57,272 compared to $44,763, a difference of 28.0%), wage/income gap (21.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 26.7%), and median household income ($88,463 compared to $70,005, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($54,279 compared to $47,832, a difference of 13.5%), median earnings ($48,286 compared to $40,672, a difference of 18.7%), and per capita income ($43,405 compared to $36,475, a difference of 19.0%).
Income Metric | Sierra Leonean | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,405 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Good $103,859 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Excellent $88,463 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,286 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Average $54,279 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,868 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,272 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Fair $93,435 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $102,427 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,038 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.4% | Tragic 27.2% |
Sierra Leonean vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (19.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 33.0%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 29.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 7.1%).
Poverty Metric | Sierra Leonean | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Fair 12.6% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Poor 9.5% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Fair 11.4% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Fair 13.7% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.0% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.2% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Fair 17.7% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 17.8% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Good 12.6% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.7% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.2% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.4% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Good 5.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.5% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Fair 12.2% | Tragic 13.1% |
Sierra Leonean vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 24.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 6.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 6.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Sierra Leonean | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 6.2% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 5.5% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.7% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.5% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.2% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.5% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Average 7.7% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.9% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.8% | Good 5.4% |
Sierra Leonean vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (68.9% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 10.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.5% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.6% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Sierra Leonean | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 68.9% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.5% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.6% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.3% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.8% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.0% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 86.4% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.5% | Tragic 79.0% |
Sierra Leonean vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 17.2%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 12.0%), and single mother households (7.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.86%), family households with children (28.9% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.30 compared to 3.19, a difference of 3.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Sierra Leonean | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Poor 63.9% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.9% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.9% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.30 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.7% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.4% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.1% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 34.9% | Tragic 36.3% |
Sierra Leonean vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 40.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 26.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.9% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 11.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 21.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Sierra Leonean | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 11.0% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.0% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.9% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.3% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Sierra Leonean vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 46.9%), no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 36.5%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.28%), 10th grade (93.7% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.38%), and nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.68%).
Education Level Metric | Sierra Leonean | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Fair 96.0% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Average 94.8% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Average 93.7% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Average 92.6% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.1% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.1% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Good 86.0% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 66.0% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Good 60.2% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Excellent 47.7% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.1% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Good 4.5% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Excellent 2.0% | Tragic 1.5% |
Sierra Leonean vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 79.0%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 50.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 49.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.1%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 7.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 18.4%).
Disability Metric | Sierra Leonean | Chickasaw |
Disability | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Poor 6.8% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Excellent 10.8% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 23.2% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.4% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.5% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.9% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.9% |