Russian vs Houma Community Comparison
COMPARE
Russian
Houma
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Russians
Houma
8,595
SOCIAL INDEX
83.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
62nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Houma Integration in Russian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,443,612 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Houma within Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.594. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Russians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Houma. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Russians corresponds to a decrease of 11.0 Houma.
Russian vs Houma Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Russian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,328 compared to $72,093, a difference of 61.4%), per capita income ($53,154 compared to $32,996, a difference of 61.1%), and median family income ($120,487 compared to $76,188, a difference of 58.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,389 compared to $44,356, a difference of 22.6%), median male earnings ($63,939 compared to $50,547, a difference of 26.5%), and median earnings ($53,334 compared to $38,949, a difference of 36.9%).
Income Metric | Russian | Houma |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $53,154 | Tragic $32,996 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $120,487 | Tragic $76,188 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,008 | Tragic $62,575 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $53,334 | Tragic $38,949 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $63,939 | Tragic $50,547 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $44,169 | Tragic $30,343 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,389 | Tragic $44,356 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $110,398 | Tragic $77,044 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,328 | Tragic $72,093 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $67,626 | Tragic $44,822 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.0% | Tragic 38.7% |
Russian vs Houma Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Russian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 96.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.8% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 90.3%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 88.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 34.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 39.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 47.1%).
Poverty Metric | Russian | Houma |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 18.4% |
Families | Exceptional 7.5% | Tragic 14.6% |
Males | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 20.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.5% | Tragic 26.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.1% | Tragic 22.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 22.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.5% | Tragic 24.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.8% | Tragic 26.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.9% | Tragic 21.5% |
Single Males | Excellent 12.5% | Tragic 23.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.2% | Tragic 33.8% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.4% | Tragic 26.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.3% | Tragic 43.5% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 6.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 14.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.6% | Tragic 16.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 16.5% |
Russian vs Houma Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Russian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 75.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 41.9%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 39.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.47%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Russian | Houma |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.7% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 7.1% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.4% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Tragic 21.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.6% | Tragic 8.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.9% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Average 5.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.9% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Excellent 8.8% | Tragic 12.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.8% |
Russian vs Houma Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Russian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 12.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 10.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 5.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Russian | Houma |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Poor 64.9% | Tragic 59.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.0% | Tragic 72.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Average 36.7% | Poor 35.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Fair 74.8% | Tragic 73.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.3% | Tragic 81.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.5% | Tragic 79.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Tragic 74.1% |
Russian vs Houma Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Russian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 66.1%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 50.0%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.12 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.8%), family households (63.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and currently married (48.6% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 6.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Russian | Houma |
Family Households | Tragic 63.4% | Exceptional 65.7% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.5% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.2% | Tragic 44.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.12 | Tragic 3.18 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 7.9% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.6% | Tragic 45.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 13.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.0% | Tragic 46.6% |
Russian vs Houma Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Russian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 21.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 17.3%), and no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.020%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.8% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 0.65%), and no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Russian | Houma |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.6% | Tragic 11.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.7% | Tragic 88.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 54.8% | Poor 54.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 18.8% | Tragic 16.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Tragic 4.9% |
Russian vs Houma Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Russian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 185.7%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 166.3%), and master's degree (19.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 147.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.1%).
Education Level Metric | Russian | Houma |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 96.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Tragic 95.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 94.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.0% | Tragic 92.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.2% | Tragic 90.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.3% | Tragic 87.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.2% | Tragic 83.7% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.5% | Tragic 81.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.6% | Tragic 75.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.5% | Tragic 47.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 65.1% | Tragic 41.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 53.2% | Tragic 28.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 45.3% | Tragic 21.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.5% | Tragic 7.9% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 2.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 0.96% |
Russian vs Houma Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Russian and Houma communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 83.7%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 70.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 70.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 17.4%), disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 23.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 24.0%).
Disability Metric | Russian | Houma |
Disability | Excellent 11.5% | Tragic 17.1% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Tragic 17.4% |
Females | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 16.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 9.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Good 6.5% | Tragic 9.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 18.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.2% | Tragic 32.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.5% | Tragic 56.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 3.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.4% | Tragic 19.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 9.3% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Tragic 3.0% |