Romanian vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Romanian
Ecuadorian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Romanians
Ecuadorians
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ecuadorian Integration in Romanian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 262,296,601 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Romanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.148. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Romanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.040% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Romanians corresponds to an increase of 40.1 Ecuadorians.
Romanian vs Ecuadorian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Romanian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 22.0%), median family income ($111,243 compared to $95,114, a difference of 17.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,142 compared to $54,958, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,632 compared to $53,911, a difference of 0.52%), median female earnings ($41,663 compared to $39,117, a difference of 6.5%), and median earnings ($50,244 compared to $45,214, a difference of 11.1%).
Income Metric | Romanian | Ecuadorian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $48,445 | Poor $41,958 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $111,243 | Tragic $95,114 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $91,994 | Poor $82,070 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $50,244 | Poor $45,214 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $60,063 | Tragic $51,596 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,663 | Fair $39,117 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,632 | Exceptional $53,911 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $102,544 | Poor $91,574 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $108,609 | Tragic $93,739 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,142 | Tragic $54,958 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.0% | Exceptional 22.9% |
Romanian vs Ecuadorian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Romanian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 42.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 39.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.050%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.28%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.75%).
Poverty Metric | Romanian | Ecuadorian |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 14.0% |
Families | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.0% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Tragic 14.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 19.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 19.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Males | Excellent 12.5% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.6% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.8% | Tragic 30.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 14.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 15.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 14.9% |
Romanian vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Romanian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 26.9%), female unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.2%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 10.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Romanian | Ecuadorian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.2% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.3% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.3% | Tragic 20.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.2% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Excellent 4.7% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Poor 9.0% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Poor 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.5% |
Romanian vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Romanian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 19.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.50%).
Labor Participation Metric | Romanian | Ecuadorian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Fair 65.0% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.8% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.5% | Tragic 31.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.5% | Tragic 72.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.8% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Good 84.8% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Good 84.5% | Fair 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 83.0% | Tragic 82.3% |
Romanian vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Romanian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 27.9%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 15.8%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.14%), family households (64.5% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.64%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.77%).
Family Structure Metric | Romanian | Ecuadorian |
Family Households | Good 64.5% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 43.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 7.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 43.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.8% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.7% | Poor 33.3% |
Romanian vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 107.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 38.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 14.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 32.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 37.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Romanian | Ecuadorian |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 10.9% | Tragic 22.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Tragic 77.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Average 55.5% | Tragic 42.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Tragic 14.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Tragic 4.5% |
Romanian vs Ecuadorian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Romanian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 65.9%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 44.2%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.3%).
Education Level Metric | Romanian | Ecuadorian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 3.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.1% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 96.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Tragic 95.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 94.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Tragic 93.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Tragic 91.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.8% | Tragic 90.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.8% | Tragic 89.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Tragic 88.0% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.7% | Tragic 85.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.5% | Tragic 81.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.2% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.4% | Tragic 54.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.7% | Tragic 43.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 41.6% | Tragic 35.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.2% | Poor 14.0% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 3.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 1.5% |
Romanian vs Ecuadorian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 24.9%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 16.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.25%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.76%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.6%).
Disability Metric | Romanian | Ecuadorian |
Disability | Good 11.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.6% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.1% | Fair 23.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Average 47.4% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Poor 3.1% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Average 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Excellent 6.0% | Good 6.1% |
Self-Care | Good 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |