Puerto Rican vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,018,419 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa within Puerto Rican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.172. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Puerto Ricans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Immigrants from Middle Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Puerto Ricans corresponds to an increase of 2.5 Immigrants from Middle Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($42,550 compared to $58,375, a difference of 37.2%), median family income ($70,423 compared to $93,593, a difference of 32.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($69,234 compared to $91,293, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (18.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 19.5%), median female earnings ($31,560 compared to $37,965, a difference of 20.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($39,726 compared to $47,916, a difference of 20.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (12.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 134.2%), single father poverty (31.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 101.5%), and receiving food stamps (26.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 101.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (29.8% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 35.1%), single mother poverty (44.5% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 46.9%), and single female poverty (34.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 52.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 68.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 68.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (27.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 60.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 13.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 20.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.3% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 31.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (58.1% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 16.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (68.3% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (45.7% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 30.7%), single mother households (8.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.2%), and divorced or separated (13.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.28 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.83%), family households (64.2% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and married-couple households (40.1% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 52.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.6% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 6.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.1% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 13.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 35.2%), master's degree (11.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 30.7%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 77.1%), self-care disability (3.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 57.7%), and ambulatory disability (8.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 49.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 3.5%), disability age over 75 (52.9% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 12.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 15.8%).