Pima vs Subsaharan African Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pima
Subsaharan African
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pima
Sub-Saharan Africans
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
977
SOCIAL INDEX
7.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
330th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Subsaharan African Integration in Pima Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,810,823 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.418. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Sub-Saharan Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 16.4 Sub-Saharan Africans.
Pima vs Subsaharan African Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $40,152, a difference of 31.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $90,691, a difference of 23.6%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $77,631, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $84,235, a difference of 1.7%), householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $48,691, a difference of 5.8%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 8.1%).
Income Metric | Pima | Subsaharan African |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,644 | Tragic $40,152 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $77,431 | Tragic $93,748 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,262 | Tragic $77,631 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,285 | Tragic $44,118 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,357 | Tragic $50,408 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,326 | Tragic $38,391 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,503 | Tragic $48,691 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,821 | Tragic $84,235 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,365 | Tragic $90,691 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,539 | Tragic $56,615 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.1% | Exceptional 22.8% |
Pima vs Subsaharan African Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 101.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 80.6%), and family poverty (18.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 69.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 14.6%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 23.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 29.0%).
Poverty Metric | Pima | Subsaharan African |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 10.9% |
Males | Tragic 20.4% | Tragic 13.3% |
Females | Tragic 23.6% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.4% | Tragic 22.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 25.3% | Tragic 15.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.4% | Tragic 20.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 29.0% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 29.7% | Tragic 20.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 28.2% | Tragic 20.1% |
Single Males | Tragic 20.2% | Tragic 13.7% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.3% | Tragic 23.2% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 16.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 31.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 23.9% | Tragic 13.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 14.1% |
Pima vs Subsaharan African Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 123.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 89.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 88.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Pima | Subsaharan African |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Males | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 6.0% |
Females | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 5.7% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.2% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.1% | Tragic 18.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 11.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.6% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 8.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 18.9% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 6.2% |
Pima vs Subsaharan African Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 15.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 14.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 75.7%, a difference of 9.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 12.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pima | Subsaharan African |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.4% | Exceptional 66.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.0% | Poor 79.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Exceptional 38.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.0% | Exceptional 75.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.3% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Poor 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.8% | Tragic 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Tragic 82.0% |
Pima vs Subsaharan African Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 71.0%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 40.4%), and currently married (35.9% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 6.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Pima | Subsaharan African |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Tragic 62.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 35.6% | Tragic 41.6% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.75 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 7.8% |
Currently Married | Tragic 35.9% | Tragic 42.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 12.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Tragic 36.7% |
Pima vs Subsaharan African Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 37.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 23.4%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 0.22%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 15.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pima | Subsaharan African |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 12.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.3% | Tragic 87.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.0% | Tragic 51.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.0% | Tragic 17.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 5.7% |
Pima vs Subsaharan African Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 54.2%), master's degree (9.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 54.0%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.30%), 9th grade (93.9% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.47%), and 7th grade (96.1% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.48%).
Education Level Metric | Pima | Subsaharan African |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.7% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.7% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.6% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 97.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 97.0% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Tragic 96.7% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Tragic 95.3% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Tragic 94.4% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Tragic 93.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.3% | Tragic 91.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Tragic 90.1% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.6% | Tragic 87.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 76.4% | Tragic 84.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 51.4% | Tragic 63.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 45.6% | Tragic 57.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 43.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.2% | Tragic 35.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.2% | Poor 14.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Poor 4.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Fair 1.8% |
Pima vs Subsaharan African Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 53.9%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 41.9%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.23%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.6%).
Disability Metric | Pima | Subsaharan African |
Disability | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 12.3% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 11.8% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 25.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.8% | Tragic 48.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 6.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.6% |