Pima vs Immigrants from Sudan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pima
Immigrants from Sudan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pima
Immigrants from Sudan
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,416
SOCIAL INDEX
41.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
199th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Sudan Integration in Pima Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,978,740 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sudan within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.097% in Immigrants from Sudan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 96.9 Immigrants from Sudan.
Pima vs Immigrants from Sudan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $41,986, a difference of 37.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $93,781, a difference of 27.8%), and median family income ($77,431 compared to $97,737, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $86,109, a difference of 4.0%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $38,511, a difference of 9.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $46,791, a difference of 10.1%).
Income Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Sudan |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,644 | Poor $41,986 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $77,431 | Tragic $97,737 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,262 | Tragic $79,103 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,285 | Tragic $44,767 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,357 | Tragic $51,489 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,326 | Tragic $38,511 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,503 | Tragic $46,791 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,821 | Tragic $86,109 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,365 | Tragic $93,781 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,539 | Poor $59,248 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.1% | Exceptional 23.6% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Sudan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 99.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 97.8%), and family poverty (18.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 81.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 9.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 20.8%), and single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 28.2%).
Poverty Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Sudan |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Tragic 14.1% |
Families | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 10.1% |
Males | Tragic 20.4% | Tragic 12.9% |
Females | Tragic 23.6% | Tragic 15.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.4% | Tragic 23.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 25.3% | Tragic 14.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.4% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 29.0% | Tragic 18.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 29.7% | Tragic 18.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 28.2% | Tragic 18.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 20.2% | Average 12.7% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.3% | Tragic 22.6% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Average 16.2% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 30.1% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 19.8% | Average 10.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 23.9% | Good 12.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 19.0% | Fair 12.1% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Sudan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 162.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 132.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 113.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 6.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 28.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Sudan |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.2% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.1% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 9.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.6% | Average 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 8.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 18.9% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 11.7% | Average 5.5% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Sudan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 20.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 17.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 11.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 13.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Sudan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.4% | Exceptional 67.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.0% | Exceptional 80.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Exceptional 41.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.0% | Exceptional 76.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.3% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.8% | Exceptional 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Average 82.8% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Sudan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 75.8%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 55.0%), and currently married (35.9% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.56%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and family households (65.9% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 9.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Sudan |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Tragic 60.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Fair 27.3% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 35.6% | Tragic 41.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.75 | Fair 3.22 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 6.9% |
Currently Married | Tragic 35.9% | Tragic 43.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Poor 33.2% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Sudan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 42.6%), no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 35.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 1.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 25.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Sudan |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Average 10.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.3% | Average 89.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.0% | Tragic 52.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.0% | Tragic 17.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 5.5% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Sudan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 72.8%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 69.7%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 63.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.13%), 7th grade (96.1% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.33%), and 6th grade (97.2% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.45%).
Education Level Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Sudan |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.7% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.7% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.6% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 97.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 97.1% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Tragic 96.8% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Poor 95.8% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Poor 95.5% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Poor 94.6% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Fair 93.4% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.3% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Fair 90.8% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.6% | Fair 88.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 76.4% | Fair 85.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 51.4% | Good 66.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 45.6% | Good 60.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Good 47.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.2% | Excellent 39.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Sudan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 62.2%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 57.0%), and ambulatory disability (8.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 43.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.020%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 15.0%).
Disability Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Sudan |
Disability | Tragic 13.7% | Excellent 11.5% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Excellent 11.0% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Excellent 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Poor 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Poor 11.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 38.6% | Fair 23.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.8% | Fair 47.5% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Good 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 18.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.3% |