Pima vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pima
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pima
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Integration in Pima Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,766,285 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.414. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 3.1 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.
Pima vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $51,770, a difference of 68.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $111,914, a difference of 52.5%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $95,319, a difference of 50.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $54,352, a difference of 5.5%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $43,571, a difference of 23.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $106,888, a difference of 29.1%).
Income Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,644 | Exceptional $51,770 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $77,431 | Exceptional $116,165 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,262 | Exceptional $95,319 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,285 | Exceptional $52,361 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,357 | Exceptional $62,217 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,326 | Exceptional $43,571 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,503 | Exceptional $54,352 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,821 | Exceptional $106,888 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,365 | Exceptional $111,914 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,539 | Exceptional $66,376 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.1% | Tragic 27.3% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 148.9%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 139.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 108.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 9.7%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 41.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 48.7%).
Poverty Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Families | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Males | Tragic 20.4% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Females | Tragic 23.6% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.4% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 25.3% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.4% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 29.0% | Exceptional 13.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 29.7% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 28.2% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Single Males | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.3% | Exceptional 19.0% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Good 16.2% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 27.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 23.9% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 160.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 122.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 109.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.2% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.1% | Fair 17.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Average 10.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.8% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.6% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 11.8% | Excellent 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.4% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.6% | Fair 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 18.9% | Fair 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 11.7% | Excellent 5.2% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 15.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 15.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 8.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.4% | Poor 64.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.0% | Excellent 79.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Average 36.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.0% | Average 75.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.3% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.8% | Exceptional 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 105.3%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 81.3%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 55.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 3.4%), family households (65.9% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 10.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Tragic 63.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Tragic 26.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 35.6% | Exceptional 47.8% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.75 | Tragic 3.14 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 35.9% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Exceptional 28.4% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 36.1%), no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 19.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 19.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 11.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.3% | Tragic 88.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.0% | Tragic 54.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.0% | Tragic 18.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 5.8% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 100.5%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 89.7%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 79.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.010%), 3rd grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.010%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.020%).
Education Level Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 95.7% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Exceptional 94.7% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.3% | Exceptional 93.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Exceptional 92.7% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.6% | Exceptional 90.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 76.4% | Exceptional 87.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 51.4% | Exceptional 69.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 45.6% | Exceptional 64.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 51.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.2% | Exceptional 44.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 18.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 2.4% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 83.9%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 65.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 61.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 12.7%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 15.9%), and male disability (12.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 17.7%).
Disability Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
Disability | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Excellent 10.9% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Excellent 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 21.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.8% | Exceptional 45.1% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Poor 3.1% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.4% |