Osage vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Osage
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Osage
Chinese
3,726
SOCIAL INDEX
34.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
211th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Osage Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,970,518 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.988. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.896% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 896.4 Chinese.
![Osage Integration in Chinese Communities](/correlation-charts/comparison/osage-vs-chinese/osage-vs-chinese-community-integration.webp)
Osage vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $77,465, a difference of 39.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $116,156, a difference of 31.4%), and median household income ($75,240 compared to $98,496, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 4.5%), median male earnings ($50,292 compared to $56,872, a difference of 13.1%), and median earnings ($42,651 compared to $48,836, a difference of 14.5%).
![Osage vs Chinese Income](/correlation-charts/comparison/osage-vs-chinese/osage-vs-chinese-income.webp)
Income Metric | Osage | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,568 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $91,926 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,240 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,651 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,292 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,034 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,764 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $84,461 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $88,390 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $55,677 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.1% | Average 25.9% |
Osage vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 51.4%), single female poverty (24.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 51.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 50.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 20.2%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 23.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 25.5%).
![Osage vs Chinese Poverty](/correlation-charts/comparison/osage-vs-chinese/osage-vs-chinese-poverty.webp)
Poverty Metric | Osage | Chinese |
Poverty | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Tragic 9.7% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.4% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 17.9% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.5% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 24.4% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 32.6% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.6% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Average 11.7% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Osage vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 50.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 39.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 4.0%).
![Osage vs Chinese Unemployment](/correlation-charts/comparison/osage-vs-chinese/osage-vs-chinese-unemployment.webp)
Unemployment Metric | Osage | Chinese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.7% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.9% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.5% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Good 8.9% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Osage vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 0.91%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.5%).
![Osage vs Chinese Labor Participation](/correlation-charts/comparison/osage-vs-chinese/osage-vs-chinese-labor-force.webp)
Labor Participation Metric | Osage | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.5% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.0% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.0% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.3% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.3% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.3% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.6% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Osage vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 25.4%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.2%), and divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.5% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 4.3%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.34, a difference of 5.1%), and births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 6.0%).
![Osage vs Chinese Family Structure](/correlation-charts/comparison/osage-vs-chinese/osage-vs-chinese-family-structure.webp)
Family Structure Metric | Osage | Chinese |
Family Households | Tragic 63.7% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.9% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Average 6.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Excellent 47.5% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Fair 32.1% | Excellent 30.2% |
Osage vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 13.9%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.51%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 5.1%).
![Osage vs Chinese Vehicle Availability](/correlation-charts/comparison/osage-vs-chinese/osage-vs-chinese-vehicle-availability.webp)
Vehicle Availability Metric | Osage | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.4% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.8% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.7% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Osage vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 20.6%), no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 19.2%), and associate's degree (41.5% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.23%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.24%).
![Osage vs Chinese Education Level](/correlation-charts/comparison/osage-vs-chinese/osage-vs-chinese-education-level.webp)
Education Level Metric | Osage | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.2% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Good 92.7% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 91.0% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.1% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.8% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.7% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.8% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 41.5% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.0% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.6% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.7% | Fair 1.8% |
Osage vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 60.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 40.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.27%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and hearing disability (4.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 11.3%).
![Osage vs Chinese Disability](/correlation-charts/comparison/osage-vs-chinese/osage-vs-chinese-disability.webp)
Disability Metric | Osage | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 14.3% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.8% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.5% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.8% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.1% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |