Norwegian vs Creek Community Comparison

COMPARE

Norwegian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Creek
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Norwegians

Creek

Excellent
Fair
8,521
SOCIAL INDEX
82.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
68th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Creek Integration in Norwegian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 174,793,711 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Norwegian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.388. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Norwegians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Norwegians corresponds to an increase of 6.6 Creek.
Norwegian Integration in Creek Communities

Norwegian vs Creek Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,682 compared to $78,960, a difference of 31.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,866 compared to $74,847, a difference of 29.4%), and median family income ($106,144 compared to $82,560, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 6.7%), median female earnings ($38,802 compared to $33,437, a difference of 16.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,127 compared to $45,371, a difference of 17.1%).
Norwegian vs Creek Income
Income MetricNorwegianCreek
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,480
Tragic
$35,546
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,144
Tragic
$82,560
Median Household Income
Good
$86,084
Tragic
$67,715
Median Earnings
Good
$46,865
Tragic
$39,648
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$55,965
Tragic
$46,594
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,802
Tragic
$33,437
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,127
Tragic
$45,371
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,866
Tragic
$74,847
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,682
Tragic
$78,960
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,104
Tragic
$51,949
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.0%
Tragic
27.1%

Norwegian vs Creek Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (6.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 69.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 66.2%), and married-couple family poverty (3.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 66.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 13.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 16.9%), and single father poverty (15.9% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 24.8%).
Norwegian vs Creek Poverty
Poverty MetricNorwegianCreek
Poverty
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
15.6%
Families
Exceptional
6.9%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
14.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
17.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.7%
Tragic
24.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.6%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.6%
Tragic
24.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Tragic
21.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.3%
Tragic
21.7%
Single Males
Fair
12.9%
Tragic
16.8%
Single Females
Good
20.8%
Tragic
27.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.9%
Tragic
19.8%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.4%
Tragic
36.7%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.7%
Tragic
6.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
8.7%
Average
10.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.0%
Tragic
14.1%

Norwegian vs Creek Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 34.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 31.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 6.9%).
Norwegian vs Creek Unemployment
Unemployment MetricNorwegianCreek
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.2%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.2%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.0%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
3.9%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
8.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.8%

Norwegian vs Creek Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.2% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 18.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.4% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 7.0%).
Norwegian vs Creek Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricNorwegianCreek
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Tragic
61.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.0%
Tragic
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
46.2%
Exceptional
39.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
80.1%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.1%
Tragic
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.7%
Tragic
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.4%
Tragic
77.7%

Norwegian vs Creek Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 28.5%), births to unmarried women (29.3% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 28.1%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.11%), family households (63.9% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.41%), and average family size (3.08 compared to 3.20, a difference of 3.8%).
Norwegian vs Creek Family Structure
Family Structure MetricNorwegianCreek
Family Households
Poor
63.9%
Fair
64.2%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.4%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.5%
Tragic
45.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.08
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
50.2%
Poor
46.0%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Tragic
14.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.3%
Tragic
37.6%

Norwegian vs Creek Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 20.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 11.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 7.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 9.0%).
Norwegian vs Creek Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricNorwegianCreek
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.4%
Exceptional
7.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.7%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
62.8%
Exceptional
58.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.9%
Exceptional
21.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
7.2%

Norwegian vs Creek Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 36.6%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 35.3%), and master's degree (14.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.33%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.33%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.33%).
Norwegian vs Creek Education Level
Education Level MetricNorwegianCreek
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.3%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
96.9%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Exceptional
94.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
95.2%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
94.0%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.5%
Tragic
88.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.0%
Tragic
83.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.4%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.7%
Tragic
52.2%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
47.6%
Tragic
37.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
37.5%
Tragic
28.9%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.0%
Tragic
10.5%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.2%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Tragic
1.3%

Norwegian vs Creek Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 56.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 47.3%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 1.9%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 10.7%), and disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 13.0%).
Norwegian vs Creek Disability
Disability MetricNorwegianCreek
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
15.6%
Males
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
15.5%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Tragic
15.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Fair
5.7%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.6%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.5%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.5%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.5%
Tragic
51.5%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
4.4%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
8.5%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.8%