Norwegian vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Norwegian
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Norwegians
Chinese
8,521
SOCIAL INDEX
82.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
68th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Norwegian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,594,663 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Norwegian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.002. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Norwegians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Norwegians corresponds to a decrease of 0.0 Chinese.
Norwegian vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,104 compared to $77,465, a difference of 26.8%), median household income ($86,084 compared to $98,496, a difference of 14.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,682 compared to $116,156, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,965 compared to $56,872, a difference of 1.6%), per capita income ($44,480 compared to $46,098, a difference of 3.6%), and median earnings ($46,865 compared to $48,836, a difference of 4.2%).
Income Metric | Norwegian | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Good $44,480 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,144 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Good $86,084 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Good $46,865 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $55,965 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,802 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,127 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $96,866 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,682 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $61,104 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 29.0% | Average 25.9% |
Norwegian vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (20.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 29.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 28.3%), and single male poverty (12.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (3.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 1.9%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 4.2%).
Poverty Metric | Norwegian | Chinese |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Exceptional 6.9% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Exceptional 11.5% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.7% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.6% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.6% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.2% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Fair 12.9% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Good 20.8% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.9% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.4% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.7% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.0% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Norwegian vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 65.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (3.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 2.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Norwegian | Chinese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.0% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.0% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 3.9% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Norwegian vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 19.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (80.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (84.4% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.63%).
Labor Participation Metric | Norwegian | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.7% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.0% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 46.2% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 80.1% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.1% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.7% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.6% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.4% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Norwegian vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 22.0%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.4%), and average family size (3.08 compared to 3.34, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (50.2% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 1.4%), married-couple households (49.5% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and births to unmarried women (29.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 3.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Norwegian | Chinese |
Family Households | Poor 63.9% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.4% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.5% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.08 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.5% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 50.2% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.3% | Excellent 30.2% |
Norwegian vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 27.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 10.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 0.030%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.7% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 4.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Norwegian | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.4% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 93.7% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 62.8% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.0% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Norwegian vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 9.3%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 6.5%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (89.0% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 0.040%), college, under 1 year (68.4% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.18%).
Education Level Metric | Norwegian | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.3% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 96.2% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 95.2% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 94.0% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.5% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.4% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 61.7% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Excellent 47.6% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Average 37.5% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Poor 14.0% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Fair 4.2% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Average 1.8% | Fair 1.8% |
Norwegian vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 47.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 21.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.090%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.27%).
Disability Metric | Norwegian | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Fair 5.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.6% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Fair 11.5% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.5% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.5% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.5% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |