Moroccan vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Moroccan
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Moroccans
Chickasaw
3,626
SOCIAL INDEX
33.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
215th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Moroccan Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,209,086 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Moroccan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.192. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Moroccans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.090% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Moroccans corresponds to an increase of 89.6 Chickasaw.
![Moroccan Integration in Chickasaw Communities](/correlation-charts/comparison/moroccans-vs-chickasaw/moroccans-vs-chickasaw-community-integration.webp)
Moroccan vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,854 compared to $36,475, a difference of 25.7%), median household income ($86,468 compared to $70,005, a difference of 23.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,117 compared to $77,929, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,683 compared to $53,732, a difference of 11.1%), wage/income gap (24.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 13.3%), and median male earnings ($56,499 compared to $47,832, a difference of 18.1%).
![Moroccan vs Chickasaw Income](/correlation-charts/comparison/moroccans-vs-chickasaw/moroccans-vs-chickasaw-income.webp)
Income Metric | Moroccan | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $45,854 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Good $104,488 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Good $86,468 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,838 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,499 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,872 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,256 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $96,117 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Average $100,138 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Fair $59,683 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.0% | Tragic 27.2% |
Moroccan vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 26.6%), single female poverty (21.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 25.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.1%), receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (17.8% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 10.2%).
![Moroccan vs Chickasaw Poverty](/correlation-charts/comparison/moroccans-vs-chickasaw/moroccans-vs-chickasaw-poverty.webp)
Poverty Metric | Moroccan | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 9.8% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.0% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.8% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 18.2% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 17.7% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 17.8% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Fair 12.9% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Average 21.0% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Fair 29.5% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.0% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 13.1% |
Moroccan vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 20.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.50%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 3.9%).
![Moroccan vs Chickasaw Unemployment](/correlation-charts/comparison/moroccans-vs-chickasaw/moroccans-vs-chickasaw-unemployment.webp)
Unemployment Metric | Moroccan | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 5.5% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.7% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Fair 5.5% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.8% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Average 8.9% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.9% | Good 5.4% |
Moroccan vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.7% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.3%).
![Moroccan vs Chickasaw Labor Participation](/correlation-charts/comparison/moroccans-vs-chickasaw/moroccans-vs-chickasaw-labor-force.webp)
Labor Participation Metric | Moroccan | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.1% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.7% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Fair 74.7% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Fair 84.5% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Average 84.6% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.2% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Poor 82.5% | Tragic 79.0% |
Moroccan vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 25.7%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 17.2%), and births to unmarried women (31.8% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.2%), family households (61.9% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and currently married (44.6% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 4.5%).
![Moroccan vs Chickasaw Family Structure](/correlation-charts/comparison/moroccans-vs-chickasaw/moroccans-vs-chickasaw-family-structure.webp)
Family Structure Metric | Moroccan | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Tragic 61.9% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.9% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.5% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.22 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Poor 6.6% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.6% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.1% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Average 31.8% | Tragic 36.3% |
Moroccan vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 86.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 51.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 8.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (48.8% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 20.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 39.8%).
![Moroccan vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability](/correlation-charts/comparison/moroccans-vs-chickasaw/moroccans-vs-chickasaw-vehicle-availability.webp)
Vehicle Availability Metric | Moroccan | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 85.4% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 48.8% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Moroccan vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 47.3%), master's degree (16.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 46.9%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.030%), high school diploma (88.8% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.48%), and nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.59%).
![Moroccan vs Chickasaw Education Level](/correlation-charts/comparison/moroccans-vs-chickasaw/moroccans-vs-chickasaw-education-level.webp)
Education Level Metric | Moroccan | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Poor 97.3% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Poor 97.1% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Poor 95.8% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Poor 95.5% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Poor 94.6% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.5% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 90.9% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Fair 88.8% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.5% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Average 65.6% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Good 60.2% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Excellent 48.2% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.5% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 1.5% |
Moroccan vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 59.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 46.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 5.0%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 8.5%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 14.3%).
![Moroccan vs Chickasaw Disability](/correlation-charts/comparison/moroccans-vs-chickasaw/moroccans-vs-chickasaw-disability.webp)
Disability Metric | Moroccan | Chickasaw |
Disability | Excellent 11.5% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Excellent 11.0% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Excellent 1.2% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Poor 5.7% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Excellent 6.4% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Good 11.0% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 23.3% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Good 47.2% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Fair 2.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Average 6.1% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Fair 2.5% | Tragic 2.9% |