Mongolian vs Tsimshian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Mongolian
Tsimshian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Mongolians
Tsimshian
8,008
SOCIAL INDEX
77.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
93rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tsimshian Integration in Mongolian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 11,271,650 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian within Mongolian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.833. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mongolians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.228% in Tsimshian. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mongolians corresponds to an increase of 227.5 Tsimshian.
Mongolian vs Tsimshian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($60,350 compared to $48,836, a difference of 23.6%), per capita income ($49,173 compared to $40,344, a difference of 21.9%), and median earnings ($51,038 compared to $43,695, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,540 compared to $54,649, a difference of 4.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,578 compared to $97,809, a difference of 6.9%), and median female earnings ($42,542 compared to $39,530, a difference of 7.6%).
Income Metric | Mongolian | Tsimshian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $49,173 | Tragic $40,344 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $114,553 | Fair $101,543 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $93,971 | Fair $83,346 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $51,038 | Tragic $43,695 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $60,350 | Tragic $48,836 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,542 | Average $39,530 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,540 | Exceptional $54,649 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,578 | Excellent $97,809 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,602 | Poor $96,783 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,326 | Tragic $58,202 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.6% | Exceptional 23.9% |
Mongolian vs Tsimshian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 50.5%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 34.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.62%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.80%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 1.8%).
Poverty Metric | Mongolian | Tsimshian |
Poverty | Average 12.4% | Tragic 13.0% |
Families | Excellent 8.6% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Fair 11.3% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Average 13.4% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.6% | Tragic 21.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 16.1% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.2% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Average 16.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.4% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.2% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.2% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.3% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.7% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Married Couples | Good 5.0% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Average 10.9% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Average 12.2% | Tragic 16.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 15.7% |
Mongolian vs Tsimshian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 163.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 82.4%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 64.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Mongolian | Tsimshian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 7.2% |
Males | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 8.5% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 16.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.9% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 18.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Average 5.1% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Excellent 8.6% | Tragic 10.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.5% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.4% | Tragic 11.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.0% | Poor 5.6% |
Mongolian vs Tsimshian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.64%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Mongolian | Tsimshian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.1% | Tragic 64.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 79.9% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 35.3% | Excellent 37.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.3% | Tragic 72.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.1% | Exceptional 88.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.3% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.8% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.3% | Tragic 77.4% |
Mongolian vs Tsimshian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 51.0%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 40.9%), and divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and currently married (46.4% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 2.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Mongolian | Tsimshian |
Family Households | Tragic 62.8% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Average 46.3% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Fair 46.4% | Exceptional 47.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 13.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 42.2% |
Mongolian vs Tsimshian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 52.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 7.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 5.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 5.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Mongolian | Tsimshian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 87.0% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.8% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.1% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.8% | Fair 6.2% |
Mongolian vs Tsimshian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 96.3%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 92.9%), and master's degree (19.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 70.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.0% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 0.43%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 0.98%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.99%).
Education Level Metric | Mongolian | Tsimshian |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.9% |
Kindergarten | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.8% |
1st Grade | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.8% |
2nd Grade | Fair 97.8% | Exceptional 98.8% |
3rd Grade | Fair 97.7% | Exceptional 98.8% |
4th Grade | Fair 97.5% | Exceptional 98.6% |
5th Grade | Fair 97.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
6th Grade | Average 97.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
7th Grade | Average 96.0% | Exceptional 97.8% |
8th Grade | Average 95.8% | Exceptional 99.0% |
9th Grade | Good 95.0% | Exceptional 97.0% |
10th Grade | Good 94.0% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Excellent 93.0% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Excellent 91.8% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 89.9% | Exceptional 91.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.0% | Excellent 86.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.9% | Poor 64.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.8% | Poor 57.9% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 53.0% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 45.4% | Tragic 28.8% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.4% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 1.4% |
Mongolian vs Tsimshian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Tsimshian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 110.3%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 71.7%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 65.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.7%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 13.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 18.6%).
Disability Metric | Mongolian | Tsimshian |
Disability | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 16.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 16.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 2.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.8% | Tragic 32.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Tragic 59.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 4.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.7% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.5% | Tragic 8.8% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |