Mongolian vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,455,798 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Mongolian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.345. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mongolians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.087% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mongolians corresponds to an increase of 86.7 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,602 compared to $87,255, a difference of 27.9%), median family income ($114,553 compared to $90,543, a difference of 26.5%), and median household income ($93,971 compared to $74,279, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 6.2%), householder income under 25 years ($52,540 compared to $47,380, a difference of 10.9%), and median female earnings ($42,542 compared to $36,408, a difference of 16.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 36.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 36.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 6.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 9.8%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 35.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 22.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 13.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 36.9%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 26.9%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 0.86%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.3%), and currently married (46.4% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 19.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 72.8%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 66.0%), and master's degree (19.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 50.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.0% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.15%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 41.7%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 35.0%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 2.5%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.9%).