Lumbee vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison
COMPARE
Lumbee
Immigrants from China
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Lumbee
Immigrants from China
2,002
SOCIAL INDEX
17.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
276th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from China Integration in Lumbee Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,105,825 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Lumbee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.015. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lumbee corresponds to a decrease of 0.3 Immigrants from China.
Lumbee vs Immigrants from China Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($60,305 compared to $119,756, a difference of 98.6%), median household income ($54,644 compared to $105,335, a difference of 92.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($65,113 compared to $122,178, a difference of 87.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 25.1%), median female earnings ($32,500 compared to $46,972, a difference of 44.5%), and median earnings ($36,876 compared to $56,638, a difference of 53.6%).
Income Metric | Lumbee | Immigrants from China |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $29,845 | Exceptional $54,264 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $68,679 | Exceptional $125,540 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $54,644 | Exceptional $105,335 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $36,876 | Exceptional $56,638 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $41,715 | Exceptional $67,353 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $32,500 | Exceptional $46,972 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $34,584 | Exceptional $57,931 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $60,305 | Exceptional $119,756 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $65,113 | Exceptional $122,178 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $40,550 | Exceptional $69,174 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.3% | Poor 26.7% |
Lumbee vs Immigrants from China Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (33.3% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 144.8%), receiving food stamps (22.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 139.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (31.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 134.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 49.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 54.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (18.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 57.9%).
Poverty Metric | Lumbee | Immigrants from China |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Tragic 20.2% | Excellent 10.7% |
Females | Tragic 23.5% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 31.1% | Average 20.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 33.3% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 31.0% | Exceptional 13.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 31.9% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 30.7% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 25.2% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 33.0% | Exceptional 18.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 28.5% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 43.2% | Exceptional 26.1% |
Married Couples | Tragic 8.3% | Excellent 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 11.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 19.7% | Tragic 13.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 22.9% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Lumbee vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 121.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 79.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 73.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 9.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Lumbee | Immigrants from China |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.4% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Tragic 6.9% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 5.9% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.3% | Average 11.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.1% | Good 17.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.0% | Fair 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.2% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.6% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.9% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.6% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Lumbee vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (56.8% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 15.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (70.6% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 12.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (77.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 0.55%), in labor force | age 25-29 (78.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (65.5% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 8.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Lumbee | Immigrants from China |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 56.8% | Excellent 65.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 70.6% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.0% | Tragic 31.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 65.5% | Tragic 71.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 78.3% | Average 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 77.3% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 77.0% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 75.6% | Exceptional 83.2% |
Lumbee vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (48.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 95.3%), single mother households (9.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 79.8%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.6%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (26.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Lumbee | Immigrants from China |
Family Households | Tragic 63.1% | Excellent 64.7% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.3% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 39.6% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.32 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 9.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 39.8% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 48.2% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Lumbee vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 46.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 45.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 5.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 27.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Lumbee | Immigrants from China |
No Vehicles Available | Average 10.3% | Tragic 15.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Average 89.7% | Tragic 84.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Good 55.9% | Tragic 51.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.1% | Tragic 18.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Poor 6.0% |
Lumbee vs Immigrants from China Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 183.4%), professional degree (2.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 173.3%), and master's degree (9.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 128.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.4% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.10%), 8th grade (96.0% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Education Level Metric | Lumbee | Immigrants from China |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Tragic 2.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 96.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Tragic 95.3% |
8th Grade | Excellent 96.0% | Tragic 95.0% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.4% | Tragic 94.3% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.7% | Tragic 93.2% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.9% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 85.7% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 83.6% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 80.0% | Exceptional 86.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 54.2% | Exceptional 70.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 48.9% | Exceptional 66.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 34.1% | Exceptional 55.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 24.8% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.1% | Exceptional 3.1% |
Lumbee vs Immigrants from China Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (17.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 102.8%), vision disability (3.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 84.6%), and ambulatory disability (9.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 79.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 13.0%), disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 21.4%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 27.3%).
Disability Metric | Lumbee | Immigrants from China |
Disability | Tragic 15.5% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Males | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.8% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 0.96% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 17.6% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.7% | Exceptional 20.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 56.2% | Exceptional 46.3% |
Vision | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.1% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 19.1% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 9.5% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.0% | Exceptional 2.3% |