Lebanese vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Lebanese
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Lebanese
Chinese
7,328
SOCIAL INDEX
70.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
122nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Lebanese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,968,993 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Lebanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.089. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lebanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lebanese corresponds to an increase of 6.3 Chinese.
Lebanese vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,287 compared to $77,465, a difference of 24.4%), householder income under 25 years ($50,355 compared to $58,162, a difference of 15.5%), and median household income ($88,091 compared to $98,496, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($45,840 compared to $46,098, a difference of 0.56%), median male earnings ($57,409 compared to $56,872, a difference of 0.95%), and median earnings ($48,226 compared to $48,836, a difference of 1.3%).
Income Metric | Lebanese | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $45,840 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $107,086 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Excellent $88,091 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,226 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $57,409 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Good $40,006 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,355 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,339 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $104,734 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $62,287 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.9% | Average 25.9% |
Lebanese vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 47.9%), child poverty among boys under 16 (16.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 39.5%), and family poverty (8.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 13.9%), single father poverty (17.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 15.0%), and single mother poverty (29.4% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 19.5%).
Poverty Metric | Lebanese | Chinese |
Poverty | Average 12.3% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Average 8.9% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Average 13.4% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.2% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Average 17.4% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Average 16.3% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.6% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Average 16.6% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Good 20.8% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Fair 29.4% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 11.9% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.1% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Lebanese vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 52.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 15.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.4% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 4.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Lebanese | Chinese |
Unemployment | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.4% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Average 10.3% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Average 4.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Poor 9.0% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.8% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.5% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Lebanese vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.18%).
Labor Participation Metric | Lebanese | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.5% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 79.1% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.3% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Poor 84.4% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.6% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Poor 82.5% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Lebanese vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.9%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 8.8%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 2.3%), currently married (47.9% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.34, a difference of 4.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Lebanese | Chinese |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Excellent 27.7% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.9% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.9% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.5% | Excellent 30.2% |
Lebanese vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 39.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 19.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.46%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Lebanese | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.4% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.6% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Good 20.0% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Average 6.4% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Lebanese vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 26.8%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 16.3%), and master's degree (16.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.39%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.40%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.40%).
Education Level Metric | Lebanese | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.2% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.4% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.2% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.5% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 61.6% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.8% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.4% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.5% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.0% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Fair 1.8% |
Lebanese vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 18.6%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 15.8%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.5%), disability (11.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 3.7%).
Disability Metric | Lebanese | Chinese |
Disability | Fair 11.8% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Poor 11.5% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Average 12.2% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Poor 6.8% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Average 11.3% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.5% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Excellent 46.8% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Average 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 17.0% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.1% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Good 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |