Latvian vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison
COMPARE
Latvian
Tohono O'odham
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Latvians
Tohono O'odham
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tohono O'odham Integration in Latvian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,619,023 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.872. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.616% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 615.9 Tohono O'odham.
Latvian vs Tohono O'odham Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $30,256, a difference of 74.0%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $72,193, a difference of 66.6%), and median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $39,543, a difference of 60.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $45,248, a difference of 16.7%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 25.9%), and median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $33,205, a difference of 32.3%).
Income Metric | Latvian | Tohono O'odham |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $52,649 | Tragic $30,256 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $120,301 | Tragic $72,193 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $97,311 | Tragic $61,663 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $53,001 | Tragic $36,349 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $63,498 | Tragic $39,543 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,941 | Tragic $33,205 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Excellent $52,783 | Tragic $45,248 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $108,926 | Tragic $69,068 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $115,957 | Tragic $73,774 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $67,326 | Tragic $49,121 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.9% | Exceptional 22.1% |
Latvian vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 188.1%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 187.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.2% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 140.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 33.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 59.2%), and single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 60.1%).
Poverty Metric | Latvian | Tohono O'odham |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 24.4% |
Families | Exceptional 7.1% | Tragic 20.4% |
Males | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.5% | Tragic 31.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 24.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 29.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.2% | Tragic 31.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Tragic 31.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.5% | Tragic 31.6% |
Single Males | Good 12.7% | Tragic 21.6% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.0% | Tragic 34.2% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Tragic 22.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.9% | Tragic 43.0% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.9% | Tragic 11.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 20.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 19.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 21.5% |
Latvian vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 109.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 101.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 101.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 16.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 24.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Latvian | Tohono O'odham |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 8.9% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 10.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 7.7% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 22.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 12.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 9.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 8.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 9.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Excellent 8.6% | Tragic 10.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Tragic 10.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 10.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 8.9% |
Latvian vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 24.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 15.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 10.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 11.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Latvian | Tohono O'odham |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.5% | Tragic 57.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Tragic 70.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.9% | Tragic 31.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.1% | Tragic 68.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.1% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.0% | Tragic 77.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.8% | Tragic 75.1% |
Latvian vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 90.6%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 79.8%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 72.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.5%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and family households (62.8% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 7.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Latvian | Tohono O'odham |
Family Households | Tragic 62.8% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.4% | Exceptional 28.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.9% | Tragic 37.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.11 | Exceptional 3.53 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 3.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 9.1% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.5% | Tragic 36.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.7% | Tragic 49.8% |
Latvian vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 59.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 12.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 2.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 6.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 8.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Latvian | Tohono O'odham |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.8% | Tragic 15.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.3% | Tragic 84.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.2% | Tragic 50.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Poor 18.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.1% | Excellent 6.6% |
Latvian vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 119.4%), master's degree (19.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 104.2%), and bachelor's degree (46.1% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 88.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.65%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.65%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.66%).
Education Level Metric | Latvian | Tohono O'odham |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Fair 97.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Fair 97.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Fair 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Fair 97.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Poor 97.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.2% | Tragic 95.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Tragic 94.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 92.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Tragic 90.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Tragic 87.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Tragic 84.7% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Tragic 82.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.2% | Tragic 77.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 71.6% | Tragic 52.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.1% | Tragic 47.1% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 53.9% | Tragic 31.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 46.1% | Tragic 24.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.8% | Tragic 9.7% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 2.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 1.5% |
Latvian vs Tohono O'odham Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 69.8%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 66.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 64.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 6.6%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 15.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.7%).
Disability Metric | Latvian | Tohono O'odham |
Disability | Excellent 11.4% | Tragic 14.8% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 2.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Poor 6.8% | Tragic 7.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.2% | Tragic 36.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.1% | Tragic 56.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.8% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Tragic 19.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 8.7% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 3.1% |