Latvian vs Samoan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Latvian
Samoan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Latvians
Samoans
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,237
SOCIAL INDEX
39.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
202nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Samoan Integration in Latvian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 127,980,550 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.648. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.130% in Samoans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 129.8 Samoans.
Latvian vs Samoan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $39,826, a difference of 32.2%), median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $51,389, a difference of 23.6%), and median earnings ($53,001 compared to $44,206, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $65,427, a difference of 2.9%), householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $54,610, a difference of 3.5%), and wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 7.3%).
Income Metric | Latvian | Samoan |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $52,649 | Tragic $39,826 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $120,301 | Fair $100,344 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $97,311 | Good $86,498 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $53,001 | Tragic $44,206 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $63,498 | Tragic $51,389 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,941 | Tragic $37,498 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Excellent $52,783 | Exceptional $54,610 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $108,926 | Fair $92,385 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $115,957 | Good $101,580 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $67,326 | Exceptional $65,427 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.9% | Fair 26.0% |
Latvian vs Samoan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 32.3%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 25.2%), and family poverty (7.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 5.7%), and single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 5.9%).
Poverty Metric | Latvian | Samoan |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.5% | Good 12.0% |
Families | Exceptional 7.1% | Good 8.6% |
Males | Exceptional 9.6% | Good 10.9% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.5% | Exceptional 18.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.8% | Average 13.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Excellent 16.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.2% | Good 15.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Excellent 15.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.5% | Excellent 15.7% |
Single Males | Good 12.7% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.0% | Good 20.6% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Exceptional 13.8% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.9% | Excellent 28.5% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.1% | Fair 12.1% |
Latvian vs Samoan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 20.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 17.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 3.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Latvian | Samoan |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.5% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.5% |
Females | Exceptional 4.7% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 11.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Average 10.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Average 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Average 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Excellent 8.6% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Tragic 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Average 5.4% |
Latvian vs Samoan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 0.66%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 1.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Latvian | Samoan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.5% | Exceptional 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Tragic 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.9% | Exceptional 39.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.1% | Exceptional 77.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.1% | Tragic 83.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.0% | Tragic 83.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 83.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.8% | Tragic 81.8% |
Latvian vs Samoan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 30.8%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.7%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.9% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.6%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and currently married (48.5% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 3.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Latvian | Samoan |
Family Households | Tragic 62.8% | Exceptional 67.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.4% | Exceptional 29.5% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.9% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.11 | Exceptional 3.42 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Fair 6.5% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.5% | Average 46.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.7% | Fair 32.6% |
Latvian vs Samoan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 50.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 29.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 9.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 28.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Latvian | Samoan |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.8% | Exceptional 7.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.3% | Exceptional 92.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.2% | Exceptional 61.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Exceptional 25.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.1% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Latvian vs Samoan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 87.8%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 81.2%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 72.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.76%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.76%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.77%).
Education Level Metric | Latvian | Samoan |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.2% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Tragic 95.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Poor 94.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Poor 93.4% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Fair 90.8% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Poor 88.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.2% | Poor 84.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 71.6% | Tragic 63.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.1% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 53.9% | Tragic 41.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 46.1% | Tragic 31.8% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.8% | Tragic 11.5% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 1.4% |
Latvian vs Samoan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 19.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 18.7%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 3.5%).
Disability Metric | Latvian | Samoan |
Disability | Excellent 11.4% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Tragic 11.9% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Poor 12.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Excellent 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Poor 6.8% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.2% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.1% | Tragic 49.5% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Poor 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.3% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Tragic 17.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Poor 6.3% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |