Latvian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Latvian
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Latvians
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Integration in Latvian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,605,945 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.687. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.026% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 25.8 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.
Latvian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($115,957 compared to $111,914, a difference of 3.6%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $116,165, a difference of 3.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $54,352, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $43,571, a difference of 0.85%), median earnings ($53,001 compared to $52,361, a difference of 1.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $66,376, a difference of 1.4%).
Income Metric | Latvian | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $52,649 | Exceptional $51,770 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $120,301 | Exceptional $116,165 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $97,311 | Exceptional $95,319 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $53,001 | Exceptional $52,361 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $63,498 | Exceptional $62,217 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,941 | Exceptional $43,571 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Excellent $52,783 | Exceptional $54,352 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $108,926 | Exceptional $106,888 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $115,957 | Exceptional $111,914 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $67,326 | Exceptional $66,376 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.9% | Tragic 27.3% |
Latvian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 17.5%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 8.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.29%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.7%).
Poverty Metric | Latvian | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Families | Exceptional 7.1% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Males | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.5% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.8% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.2% | Exceptional 13.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.5% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Single Males | Good 12.7% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.0% | Exceptional 19.0% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Good 16.2% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.9% | Exceptional 27.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.9% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.8% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.1% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Latvian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 7.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.6%), and female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Latvian | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.0% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Fair 17.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Average 10.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Excellent 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Fair 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Excellent 8.6% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Fair 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Excellent 5.2% |
Latvian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.68%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.77%).
Labor Participation Metric | Latvian | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.5% | Poor 64.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Excellent 79.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.9% | Average 36.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.1% | Average 75.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.1% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.0% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.4% | Exceptional 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.8% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Latvian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 2.4%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.9% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.22%), currently married (48.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.72%).
Family Structure Metric | Latvian | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
Family Households | Tragic 62.8% | Tragic 63.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.4% | Tragic 26.2% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.9% | Exceptional 47.8% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.11 | Tragic 3.14 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.5% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.7% | Exceptional 28.4% |
Latvian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 20.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 4.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Latvian | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.8% | Tragic 11.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.3% | Tragic 88.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.2% | Tragic 54.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Tragic 18.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Latvian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 18.1%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.0%), and professional degree (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.29%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.30%).
Education Level Metric | Latvian | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.2% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 95.7% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Exceptional 94.7% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Exceptional 93.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 92.7% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Exceptional 90.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.2% | Exceptional 87.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 71.6% | Exceptional 69.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.1% | Exceptional 64.1% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 53.9% | Exceptional 51.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 46.1% | Exceptional 44.0% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.8% | Exceptional 18.5% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Exceptional 2.4% |
Latvian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 9.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 0.010%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and female disability (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.3%).
Disability Metric | Latvian | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
Disability | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Excellent 10.9% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Excellent 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Poor 6.8% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.2% | Exceptional 21.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.1% | Exceptional 45.1% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Poor 3.1% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.4% |