Laotian vs Yakama Community Comparison
COMPARE
Laotian
Yakama
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Laotians
Yakama
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,331
SOCIAL INDEX
10.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
315th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Yakama Integration in Laotian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,734,664 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.797. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.275% in Yakama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 274.9 Yakama.
Laotian vs Yakama Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,041 compared to $33,009, a difference of 42.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,993 compared to $76,226, a difference of 37.7%), and median family income ($112,859 compared to $83,932, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $54,321, a difference of 0.090%), wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 11.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,306 compared to $56,234, a difference of 17.9%).
Income Metric | Laotian | Yakama |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $47,041 | Tragic $33,009 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $112,859 | Tragic $83,932 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $94,990 | Tragic $72,225 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $50,343 | Tragic $39,107 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $59,351 | Tragic $45,002 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,133 | Tragic $33,354 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,369 | Exceptional $54,321 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,993 | Tragic $76,226 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,051 | Tragic $86,992 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,306 | Tragic $56,234 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.4% | Exceptional 23.7% |
Laotian vs Yakama Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 114.9%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 90.1%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 61.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 20.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 31.7%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 34.4%).
Poverty Metric | Laotian | Yakama |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 16.7% |
Families | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 13.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females | Exceptional 12.6% | Tragic 18.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.2% | Tragic 25.3% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 17.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Tragic 23.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 22.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 21.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 22.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 15.9% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.3% | Tragic 28.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.1% | Tragic 18.1% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.0% | Tragic 36.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 9.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.6% | Tragic 14.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.3% | Tragic 18.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 21.4% |
Laotian vs Yakama Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 123.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 86.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 86.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 22.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 23.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Laotian | Yakama |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Tragic 7.3% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Tragic 7.9% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Tragic 6.7% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Tragic 15.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Tragic 22.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 13.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Tragic 8.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 9.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.6% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 8.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 5.4% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Tragic 6.7% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 18.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.5% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 9.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 8.1% |
Laotian vs Yakama Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 4.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Laotian | Yakama |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.8% | Tragic 62.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.6% | Tragic 75.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.9% | Good 36.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 74.1% | Average 75.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.4% | Tragic 80.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Average 84.7% | Tragic 79.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Poor 84.2% | Tragic 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 82.9% | Tragic 80.6% |
Laotian vs Yakama Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 87.7%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 44.4%), and births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.8% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 5.4%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.45, a difference of 5.8%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 7.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Laotian | Yakama |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.8% | Exceptional 69.3% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.5% | Exceptional 30.8% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 45.2% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.26 | Exceptional 3.45 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 4.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 8.4% |
Currently Married | Excellent 47.4% | Tragic 44.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.5% | Tragic 40.3% |
Laotian vs Yakama Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 75.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 44.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 10.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 37.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Laotian | Yakama |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.1% | Exceptional 6.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.0% | Exceptional 93.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.6% | Exceptional 64.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Exceptional 31.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 12.9% |
Laotian vs Yakama Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 79.9%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 79.8%), and bachelor's degree (42.0% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 71.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.3%).
Education Level Metric | Laotian | Yakama |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Tragic 3.6% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.8% | Tragic 96.6% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Tragic 96.6% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Tragic 96.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Tragic 96.4% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Tragic 95.9% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 95.2% |
5th Grade | Poor 97.1% | Tragic 94.8% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Tragic 94.3% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Tragic 91.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Tragic 91.2% |
9th Grade | Fair 94.6% | Tragic 90.1% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.6% | Tragic 86.9% |
11th Grade | Average 92.6% | Tragic 85.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Tragic 82.5% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Tragic 80.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.5% | Tragic 74.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.5% | Tragic 52.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.8% | Tragic 46.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.9% | Tragic 32.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.0% | Tragic 24.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.0% | Tragic 9.5% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 3.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.3% |
Laotian vs Yakama Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 44.2%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 36.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 4.8%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 11.2%).
Disability Metric | Laotian | Yakama |
Disability | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 13.4% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 13.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Exceptional 1.00% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 13.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.3% | Tragic 29.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Poor 47.9% | Tragic 51.3% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.5% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 3.9% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 6.8% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Tragic 2.7% |